PDA

View Full Version : Dirt 2 - Benchmark FPS


zalmanuk
12-05-2009, 08:45 PM
Hi

Im trying to test this game on my PC and I decided to make this thread so please post your setup and benchark result :)

PS. Its not a place to fight ATI or NVIDIA are better
PS1. Every benchmark count not only with HIGH fps
PS2. If u play this game post your benchmark ( no one will laugh or something !!! )
PS3. Noobs stay AWAY from this thread

I will start :)

Dirt 2 PC DirectX 11 Ultra Settings Benchmark 1920x1200

ALL .XML FILES ARE UNTUCH !!! NO TWEAKS OR CUSTOMIZE CONFIGS !!!

1st run:
Test system:

i7 920 @ 3.8Ghz
ATI HIS 5970 @ stock clocks
Asus P6T Dv2
12Gb Corsair 1600Mhz
Vista 64bit

Average FPS: 66.0
Minimum FPS: 60.0

2nd run:
Test system:

i7 920 @ 3.8Ghz
ATI HIS 5970 @ 990/1300
Asus P6T Dv2
12Gb Corsair 1600Mhz
Vista 64bit

Average FPS: 79.2
Minimum FPS: 71.8

screen:

http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/4452/firefox2009120604432619.jpg

NJuice
12-05-2009, 09:05 PM
Dirt 2 PC DirectX 11 Ultra Settings Benchmark 1920x1200

What level of AA and what AA setting in CCC (MSAA, AAA or SSAA and box, narrow, wide or edge detect)?

jassinlive
12-06-2009, 03:56 AM
i have similar specs:

i7 920 @ 3.2Ghz
ATI MSI 5850
Asus P6T
6GBGb Corsair 1600Mhz
Win7 Pro 64bit
Resolution: 1360x768 (Getting bigger monitor for chrisy

Everything Maxed including Vsync, and x8 AA

FPS
Avg: 30.9
Min: 30.0

It looks good and runs fine at 30fps, but these are the settings i use:

Everything on HIGH, x4AA and no Vsync

FPS
Avg: 67
Min: 58

Although
the difference in 30fps and 67fps is large, playing the game i could see no real difference.. i jsut prefer it for when i hit high demanding areas t doesn't spaz out.

mad1723
12-06-2009, 04:29 AM
For ATI users, make sure you have the hotfix installed to have optimal performance: http://support.amd.com/us/kbarticles/Pages/GPU41-Hotfix-to-improve-Dirt2-performance.aspx

zerorate
12-06-2009, 07:38 AM
AMD Phenom x4 955 3.2ghz
Sapphire 5850 @ stock
4gb DDR2 1066mhz
23" 1920x1080
Windows 7

Ultra with 8xAA DX 11
CCC AI off
CCC AA/AF aplication
CCC MiniMap Quality
CCC AA mode MS

Before Hot Fix: Min FPS: 29.9 Average: 52.2

After Hot fix: Min FPS: 41 Average: 58.8

Ultravore
12-06-2009, 10:46 AM
AMD Phenom II 955 4x 3,2GHz
Leadtek WinFast PX9800GX2
4GB DDR2-800 CL5
MSI K9A2 CF-F
Win 7 32-bit

max settings @1680x1050
4xMSAA
NO VSYNC (because it is useless)

min FPS 30
avg FPS 37

it is a smooth gameplay all the time, that's nice. I am wondering that my 9800 GX2 does that.

/edit: i changed nothing but now i get

min FPS 32,5
avg FPS 37,5

chevelleking
12-06-2009, 11:52 AM
I have found for V-sync issues at 30fps, start the game immediately go to the graphics settings in the game, it should read 30fps, change a setting such as monitor frequency, one that gets the screen to go black, this should reset the v-sync to 60fps.

jassinlive
12-06-2009, 01:55 PM
I have found for V-sync issues at 30fps, start the game immediately go to the graphics settings in the game, it should read 30fps, change a setting such as monitor frequency, one that gets the screen to go black, this should reset the v-sync to 60fps.

could you please explain this more clearly mate?

theyarecoming4u
12-06-2009, 03:38 PM
i7 920 @4GHz | 6GB DDR3 | 5970 @900/1325 (w/hotfix drivers)
Win7 x64

1920x1200, 4xAA - Ultra (DX11)

Average FPS: 75.3
Minimum FPS: 66.9

Hopefully when ATi finally sorts their drivers out we'll see some reasonable performance improvements but the game plays great maxed out at the moment.

VRocker
12-06-2009, 04:29 PM
This is a really nice game :) Just tried it today.

My system:
AMD Phenom II X4 955
4GB Corsair XMS2 800MHz CL4
ATi Radeon HD4870 1GB
Windows 7 Home Premium x64

All settings apart from post processing are on high.
Resolution @ 1680x150 with 4x AA

Average FPS: 61.1
Minimum FPS: 55.3

:)

teoamatate1
12-06-2009, 05:11 PM
AMD Phenom x4 955 3.2ghz
Sapphire 5850 @ stock
4gb DDR2 1066mhz
23" 1920x1080
Windows 7

Ultra with 8xAA DX 11
CCC AI off
CCC AA/AF aplication
CCC MiniMap Quality
CCC AA mode MS

Before Hot Fix: Min FPS: 29.9 Average: 52.2

After Hot fix: Min FPS: 41 Average: 58.8

why did the hotfix improve your performance?
wasn't this supossed to be for crossfire issues only?
if that's not the case the hotfix should be install always.

zerorate
12-06-2009, 05:17 PM
It allso fixes The Witcher go figure.

zalmanuk
12-07-2009, 04:16 PM
What level of AA and what AA setting in CCC (MSAA, AAA or SSAA and bow, narrow, wide or edge detect)?

AA x 8
Vsync off

In CCC everythig: use app settings

Unoid
12-08-2009, 11:30 AM
q6600 @ 3.6ghz
XFX 5850 @ 915/1175

1600x1200 4xfsaa, All Maxed settings no v-sync
44fps.

I dropped down to 2xfsaa and added vsync, I hate to see tearing/vertical lines when playing games.

E^vol
12-08-2009, 07:21 PM
Core2Duo E6300 @ 3.3Ghz
Asus P5Q-E
XFX HD5870 @ stock
DDR2-800 (4x1GB)
Win7 Ultimate x64

After Hotfix
All settings on Ultra 1920x1080, 8xfsaa, no Vsync.

Average FPS: 44.0
Minimum FPS: 35.8

Moto'freak
12-08-2009, 08:24 PM
9550 @4.0GHZ
Asus P5Q-what ever
HD5970 @ stock
DDR2-1066 (2x2GB)
Win7 Ultimate x64
5760x1080
4AA
FPS 32
low 28

looks like I need to install the hotfix & crank up the timing

Slimcharles
12-08-2009, 09:49 PM
The hotfix is for crossfire, not single card. No reason to install it.

bes
12-08-2009, 09:53 PM
I tested the demo at:
1680x1050
8xAA
no vsync
maxed out settings in-game(aka Ultra when available)
----
Maxed out Catalyst Control panel settings(aka 24x AA, 16x AF ..etc)
----
Specs:
Phenom II X4 955BE @3.3GHZ
6gigs DDR3 1600 ram
HD5870 at stock speed
Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit OEM
----
Bench result:
48.9 Average FPS
43.1 Minimum FPS
http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn134/BES12000/Dirt2Demobench.jpg

JD83
12-08-2009, 10:32 PM
Core i7 860 &stock
Asus P7P55D
4GB DDR3 1600
HD 5870 1GB
Win7 Home Premium X64
All settings on Ultra 1920x1080 4xAA
Average fps: 68.4
Minimum fps: 45.7

james_2k
12-09-2009, 03:41 AM
funny how pretty much everyone here has an ati 5 series.

trying to justify our overpriced purchases are we? :) i hope you like your er, more realistic flags?

im downloading the demo atm will post benches in a bit.

bench done:

1920x1200 max settings that i can set in the demo 8QCSAA and 16 AF.
70 average
56 lowest

280 + i920 @ 4.2

davekeeling5
12-09-2009, 07:02 AM
Since you get the game free with a 5000 series card that you have to download with steam to play most people on here will have them! I don't call 248 "overpriced" for 2 dx11 graphics cards, its a damn good price! And dx11 does more than make the graphics better it makes games run a hell of a lot better. Me thinks that it's not only the Nvidia logo that green!

TNIYM
12-09-2009, 07:13 AM
Average 67 FPS with hotfix

i7 920 @ 4GHZ
Windows 7 x64
12GB RAM
2048x1152 vsync off
All Settings Maxed out to Ultra and High

bes
12-09-2009, 07:35 AM
I think maybe I should retest mine ...since im totally maxing everything out including stuff in the video card control panel...most if not all of you arent :p ...even though my score is still pretty good and plenty playable..

zerorate
12-09-2009, 07:51 AM
The hotfix is for crossfire, not single card. No reason to install it.

Well it's not actually a hotfix it's 9.11 with some changes and it made a change to my game performance it allso fixed The Witcher that was unplayable on 5xxx cards due to artifacting.

funny how pretty much everyone here has an ati 5 series.

trying to justify our overpriced purchases are we? i hope you like your er, more realistic flags?

I had a 7950 GT before my 5850, so my 198.99 5850 was overpriced compared to 250 - 300 for a 285 GTX?

james_2k
12-09-2009, 08:39 AM
Well it's not actually a hotfix it's 9.11 with some changes and it made a change to my game performance it allso fixed The Witcher that was unplayable on 5xxx cards due to artifacting.



I had a 7950 GT before my 5850, so my 198.99 5850 was overpriced compared to 250 - 300 for a 285 GTX?

yeah sorry i should have said 'some overpriced'

the 5850 is good value for sure.
I think maybe I should retest mine ...since im totally maxing everything out including stuff in the video card control panel...most if not all of you arent :p ...even though my score is still pretty good and plenty playable..

proud arnt we - next time get an intel system if you want the top performance :P

incidentally the differences in AA between 8 and 16+ are hardly noticable when you zoom in on a screenshot, let alone when you are flying through the desert.

fps being lower however, is much more visible.

wait till my nice shiny gtx 300 comes out then we shall see! :)

JC_Denton
12-09-2009, 10:22 AM
wait till my nice shiny gtx 300 comes out then we shall see! :)

Isn't this like the pot calling the kettle black?

But anywho, the whole 30fps with vsync is annoying and needs to be fixed. Without vsync on my 5870 I get a good amount of tearing when not in races, so not really an issue, but annoying all the same. If I have vsync on the game seems to stutter ever few seconds =(

zalmanuk
12-09-2009, 04:55 PM
Average 67 FPS with hotfix

i7 920 @ 4GHZ
Windows 7 x64
12GB RAM
2048x1152 vsync off
All Settings Maxed out to Ultra and High

what graphics card ?

trek554
12-09-2009, 05:07 PM
AMD Phenom II 955 4x 3,2GHz
Leadtek WinFast PX9800GX2
4GB DDR2-800 CL5
MSI K9A2 CF-F
Win 7 32-bit

max settings @1680x1050
4xMSAA
NO VSYNC (because it is useless)

min FPS 30
avg FPS 37

it is a smooth gameplay all the time, that's nice. I am wondering that my 9800 GX2 does that.




/edit: i changed nothing but now i get

min FPS 32,5
avg FPS 37,5

sli must not be working in this game because that looks awful for what is essentially like having 2 9800gtx cards.



Windows 7 64bit
E8500
GTX260 192sp
4gb


1920x1080 highest settings and 8x AA

E8500 @ 3.16 GTX260 @ 666/1392/2200
avg 64.1
min 46.8

E8500 @ 3.80 GTX260 @ 666/1392/2200
avg 65.5
min 50.5

TNIYM
12-09-2009, 10:24 PM
what graphics card ?
2x 5870 running xfire

james_2k
12-10-2009, 03:46 AM
sli must not be working in this game because that looks awful for what is essentially like having 2 9800gtx cards.



Windows 7 64bit
E8500
GTX260 192sp
4gb


1920x1080 highest settings and 8x AA

E8500 @ 3.16 GTX260 @ 666/1392/2200
avg 64.1
min 46.8

quite a difference in minimum fps vs a gtx 280 then even with a slightly lower res. although could also be my massively uber cpu *hides*

2x 5870 running xfire
something must be wrong if you get less fps than me with 2 of those cards.

trek554
12-10-2009, 03:58 AM
quite a difference in minimum fps vs a gtx 280 then even with a slightly lower res

um thats partly because of your cpu too. in DX9 this game will take large advantage of quad cores. http://www.pcgameshardware.com/aid,700780/Dirt-2-CPU-benchmarks-with-DirectX-9-and-DirectX-11-Phenom-doing-well-quad-cores-rule/Practice/

james_2k
12-10-2009, 04:07 AM
yeah i did add that possibility into my post :P

but the 280 is clocked pretty high 742/1566/1354

bes
12-10-2009, 09:07 AM
Bah ...thats why people have different scores here...forgot...

Thats why people should label if they are running this bench in DX9 or DX11...

DX11 is vastly slower than the DX9 test...depending on the hardware..

its all listed in the link trek554(thanks for the link) provided..

Purple44
12-10-2009, 09:56 AM
And to truly kick in the new directx11 features in DIRT 2, you need to set:

Water - Ultra
Crowds - Ultra
Cloth - High

According to this article ( Dirt 2 DX11 Performance - ATI ) Ice put up a link too:

Dirt 2 DX11 Performance Review + Interview with the DiRT 2 Senior Programmer (http://community.codemasters.com/forum/showthread.php?t=399855 )

Zwiz
12-10-2009, 10:43 AM
In the Dirt 2 demo, their was a 'Benchmark' option but I can't find it in the released game. Is it me or the option has been removed? It was useful for tuning graphics details.

NJuice
12-10-2009, 11:23 AM
And to truly kick in the new directx11 features in DIRT 2, you need to set:

Water - Ultra
Crowds - Ultra
Cloth - High


All amazing features for a racing game!

Where's my hardware tessellated damage modeling, CM?

james_2k
12-10-2009, 04:25 PM
um thats partly because of your cpu too. in DX9 this game will take large advantage of quad cores. http://www.pcgameshardware.com/aid,700780/Dirt-2-CPU-benchmarks-with-DirectX-9-and-DirectX-11-Phenom-doing-well-quad-cores-rule/Practice/

nice to see games scaling with these expensive cpu solutions though. makes me happier i bought one

NJuice
12-10-2009, 05:10 PM
um thats partly because of your cpu too. in DX9 this game will take large advantage of quad cores. http://www.pcgameshardware.com/aid,700780/Dirt-2-CPU-benchmarks-with-DirectX-9-and-DirectX-11-Phenom-doing-well-quad-cores-rule/Practice/

I think that's erroneous to say that.

Comparing performance in DX9 vs DX11, it's more likely that in DX11, they face a GPU bottleneck and CPU usage remains similar.

trek554
12-10-2009, 05:29 PM
I think that's erroneous to say that.

Comparing performance in DX9 vs DX11, it's more likely that in DX11, they face a GPU bottleneck and CPU usage remains similar.yes when switching to DX11 the load becomes much more gpu bound. at the moment his cpu is bit of overkill while overclocked but it will support him upgrading to massive amounts of gpu power with no cpu limitations for quite sometime.

eKoDaniel
12-11-2009, 06:14 PM
So umm like how do you even play the game in dx11... Or for the fact imusing nvidia 250 GTS. Im going to be only able to play it in dx9?

trek554
12-11-2009, 06:17 PM
So umm like how do you even play the game in dx11... Or for the fact imusing nvidia 250 GTS. Im going to be only able to play it in dx9? um if you dont have a DX11 card then how do you expect to play in DX11???

zalmanuk
12-11-2009, 08:59 PM
come on ppl stop talking !!!! just post yours scores !!!

jtm33
12-12-2009, 12:30 AM
This is my benchmark with all details maxed, 4xMSAA and 1680x1050.

Intel Core2 E4400 - 3GHz
4GB DDR2 - 900MHz
ATI 4870 1GB - Reg clocks
Windows 7 x64

Average - 46.7
Minimum - 38.7

Perfectly playable.

boomyak
12-12-2009, 06:05 PM
q6600 @ stock 2.4ghz
4gigs 800 mhz ddr2 ram
win 7 64x
5870 @ stock

average 41.1
low 34.4

all settings maxed, ultra,
8x msaa
1920x1200

is it just me, or am i getting ♥♥♥♥ty performance? i'm seeing guys posting higher scores, above 60fps with a similar system setup to mine, is my cpu bottlenecking that much?

or is it possibly something else, should i reformat?

trek554
12-12-2009, 06:29 PM
q6600 @ stock 2.4ghz
4gigs 800 mhz ddr2 ram
win 7 64x
5870 @ stock

average 41.1
low 34.4

all settings maxed, ultra,
8x msaa
1920x1200

is it just me, or am i getting ♥♥♥♥ty performance? i'm seeing guys posting higher scores, above 60fps with a similar system setup to mine, is my cpu bottlenecking that much?

or is it possibly something else, should i reformat?yes your cpu at just 2.4 is a pretty poor match with a card like the 5870. you really need to oc that cpu because you are not close to fully utilizing that 5870 in most modern games. you could have saved 100 bucks and gotten the identical performance with a 5850 as long as your cpu is stock.

Xerran
01-02-2010, 11:41 PM
Isn't this like the pot calling the kettle black?

But anywho, the whole 30fps with vsync is annoying and needs to be fixed. Without vsync on my 5870 I get a good amount of tearing when not in races, so not really an issue, but annoying all the same. If I have vsync on the game seems to stutter ever few seconds =(

I have the same issue, I got 58.7 in the benchmark but the game stutters. The 5850 is still new so I guess Catalyst 10.1 will fix everything. I do the love the 5850 though, great value in a little package but it does feel funny coming back to a single GPU setup after using SLi and Crossfire. There is quite a bit of overclocking headroom in the 5850 and I plan to tap every ounce of it once I get a water block on it.

Merinho46
01-09-2010, 07:03 AM
AMD Athlon X2 5200+ EE @3037.5 MHz
Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-UD2H
Sapphire HD5770 New Edition
DDR2-800 (2x1GB)
Win7 Prof x86
Catalyst 9.12
All settings on Ultra 1680x1050 (native res), 4xAA, Vsync off.

Average FPS: 35,4
Minimum FPS: 30,2

johncarr79
01-20-2010, 03:07 AM
Intel Q9550@2.83
XFX4890
4GB DDR2@800
Win 7 32 bit
Gigabyte motherboard
Cooler Master PSU
Mbox 2 Factory soundcard
Everything as high as it will allow except post processing (think it's called that) which is on medium. Regardless of resolution (tried 1280x720, 1920x1080 and 1360x768) it runs at

Minimum 42
Average 54

cwmobileo2
01-20-2010, 05:12 AM
ASRock x58 Extreme
i7 975 @ 3.99GHz
XFX HD5970 @ 975/1100
6Gb DDR3 1066
Windows 7 x64

1280*1024 @ 60Hz (Waiting for new monitor)
DX11 Max Graphics, Max CCC (including V-sync)
average min_fps=45.972271
av_fps=58.277935

V-sync/Triple Buffer Off
average min_fps=40.857765
av_fps=44.989624

Yes that is the right way round I double checked. Performance increases with V-sync on.

cody48
01-20-2010, 03:42 PM
Specs:
Intel C2D E8400 @Stock 3.0Ghz
ATI HD5770 1GB - OC'd @900Mhz Core/1300Mhz Memory
4GB DDR2-800 RAM
Windows Vista Home Premium x64

Settings:
1680x1050, 2xAA
Everything but Crowds on Ultra/max
(The DX11 crowds/tessellation REALLY hurts framerates, cutting mine by 15-20FPS)

Results:
Tested Track: London - Battersea Air (Day)
Total Frames: 3,930
Average FPS: 47.1
Minimum FPS: 36.0 (only actually went that low at the race intro, otherwise it was 40FPS+)

BigEV
01-21-2010, 08:29 AM
PC:
Intel Q6850 @ 3.33 GHz
Nvidia 8800 GTX in Sli (750MB for 1 card), 196.21 drivers
2.5 GB free RAM (4 GB total)
Windows XP Professional 32-bit

Settings used:
1280x1024
4xAA
Vsync Off
Everything on High

Results:
Total frames: 3.604
Average FPS: 42.4
Minimum FPS: 34.7

billsan101
01-22-2010, 10:10 AM
Got my card the other day (sapphire 5850), installed Dirt 2, here's my bench

C2Q Q6600 @ 3.2ghz
Gigabyte P35-DS3R
4GB (4x1gb) ddr2-800
5850 CCC OC'd 775/1125

1920x1200 (DX11)
Everything maxed out (ultra/high) 8xAA, Vsync on

Average: ~ 31.5fps
Low: ~29.5fps

Don't think I'm bottlenecking the CPU, anyone have any suggestions why it seems rather low? Could it be a vsync cap issue im reading about?

billsan101
01-22-2010, 03:53 PM
Re-did some benchmarks, trying to figure out why i was only getting ~30fps average with my new 5850.

SETUP
Vista x64
Gigabyte P35-DS3R
C2Q Q6600 @ 3.2ghz (8x400)
4GB DDR2-800 (4x1GB) OCZ Platinum Rev.2
Sapphire 5850 CCC OC'd 775/1125 (Max)
- CCC 3D Settings: Everything is set to Performance or Use Application Settings

BENCHMARKS (Dirt 2 - DirectX11)

8xMSAA, Everything ULTRA, 1920x1200
VSYNC OFF
Bench 1 | A: 53.5 | L: 33.0
Bench 2 | A: 52.6 | L: 36.0
Bench 3 | A: 53.2 | L: 36.2
VSYNC ON
Bench 1 | A: 32.7 | L: 30.0

8xMSAA, Everything ULTRA, Crowd: HIGH, Vehicle Reflections: HIGH, 1920x1200
VSYNC OFF
Bench 1 | A: 54.1 | L: 39.4
Bench 2 | A: 54.0 | L: 42.4
VSYNC ON
Bench 1 | A: 31.4 | L: 29.9
Bench 2 | A: 33.1 | L: 29.1

2xMSAA, Everything ULTRA, 1920x1200
VSYNC ON
Bench 1 | A: 33.7 | L: 30.0

I read somewhere else, that if you do have VSYNC enabled, and if it doesn't reach the specified refresh rate (in my case 60), it cuts the frames in half and caps it there. Which is odd, but that's what it seems to be doing.

cody48
01-22-2010, 04:00 PM
I read somewhere else, that if you do have VSYNC enabled, and if it doesn't reach the specified refresh rate (in my case 60), it cuts the frames in half and caps it there. Which is odd, but that's what it seems to be doing.
From what I've heard/read, that is indeed true. So if your framerate even drops to 58 instead of 60, VSync will automatically cap the framerate at 30FPS. In this case, it's best to leave VSync OFF, unless your framerate *never* drops below 60, ever. Even if 30FPS is still smooth, the random skipping from ~50FPS and 30FPS will cause horrible lagging in the game.

billsan101
01-22-2010, 04:02 PM
From what I've heard/read, that is indeed true. So if your framerate even drops to 58 instead of 60, VSync will automatically cap the framerate at 30FPS. In this case, it's best to leave VSync OFF, unless your framerate *never* drops below 60, ever. Even if 30FPS is still smooth, the random skipping from ~50FPS and 30FPS will cause horrible lagging in the game.

Ya from the numerous bench marks i ran, i can see this is the case. Thanks for the info.

trek554
01-22-2010, 04:46 PM
From what I've heard/read, that is indeed true. So if your framerate even drops to 58 instead of 60, VSync will automatically cap the framerate at 30FPS. In this case, it's best to leave VSync OFF, unless your framerate *never* drops below 60, ever. Even if 30FPS is still smooth, the random skipping from ~50FPS and 30FPS will cause horrible lagging in the game.in general that isnt true at all. there are plenty of games where I average 40 or 50 fps with vsync on. heck in many games my framerate is identical with vsync on or off even if I dont average any where near 60fps.

cody48
01-22-2010, 05:13 PM
in general that isnt true at all. there are plenty of games where I average 40 or 50 fps with vsync on. heck in many games my framerate is identical with vsync on or off even if I dont average any where near 60fps.

I didn't say in general, though. Just in Dirt 2.
In fact, Dirt 2 is the *only* game I've ever found that does this.

VSync is meant to do just as the name suggests, sync the framerate to your monitor's vertical refresh rate. As the refresh rate varies, your framerate varies in *most* games. Mostly it's just used to prevent screen tearing if you're getting a constant framerate above 60FPS. I don't know why they made D2 different, really.

billsan101
01-22-2010, 06:23 PM
The Sapphire 5850 can overclock like a beast; I was following overclockersclub.com guide (http://www.overclockersclub.com/reviews/sapphire_hd5850/6.htm) for overclocking, using their clocks and here are the results + benches.

Stock: 725/1000
OC'd: 870/1225 (AMD GPU tool + MSI afterburner)
Fan speef: 75%, load temp: ~49C
http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/4226/overclocked.jpg

Dirt 2
q6600 3.2ghz
4gb (4x1gb)
vista64

1920x1200 - Everything ultra, no vsync. (870/1225)
bench1 | A: 58.3 L: 45.8
bench2 | A: 59.5 L: 41.8
Compared to a CCC OC'd 775/1125
Bench 1 | A: 52.6 L: 36.0
Bench 2 | A: 53.2 L: 36.2

My max load was 49C, and their article said they had theirs in the high 50C's. So i think it could probably go much higher.

MrDeathhimself
01-22-2010, 07:22 PM
Phenom II x4 940 BE @3.6ghz
1tb Barracuda
8gb corsair xms2
HIS HD 4870 1gb (790mhz GPU clock, 1100mhz Mem clock)
Win7 Ultimate x64

res:1440x900

Average fps:63
Minimum fps:59

MrDeathhimself
01-22-2010, 07:26 PM
PC:
Intel Q6850 @ 3.33 GHz
Nvidia 8800 GTX in Sli (750MB for 1 card), 196.21 drivers
2.5 GB free RAM (4 GB total)
Windows XP Professional 32-bit

Settings used:
1280x1024
4xAA
Vsync Off
Everything on High

Results:
Total frames: 3.604
Average FPS: 42.4
Minimum FPS: 34.7

Free RAM?
also seems like you could benefit from x64 OS

BigEV
01-23-2010, 05:20 AM
Free RAM?
also seems like you could benefit from x64 OS
Of course, I'll upgrade to it eventually :cool:

Krystal666
01-25-2010, 12:23 PM
Core i7 860 - 3.07 GHz
RAM 4Go
2 x 5870 Crossfire Ati
Windows 7 64 bits
SynchMaster P2450H LCD

All set to ultra, 8AA, Verctical Synch ON

Average : 61.7 Fps
Min : 60.0 Fps

No need to go higher than 60 fps when vertical synch off, 'cause when i go higher than 60 fps (70/90 fps) it causes lags, less smooth.

This game reaaly rocks when caps on 60 fps, if any of you, still have lags, like loss of framerate (30/40 - 40/50 instead of 60 fps) on high spec machine, try this, while in game press "windows + L" keys, once on the windows log screen, loggin and then, u'll be back to game with a new higher refreshed frame rate.

NitrousX
01-27-2010, 02:52 PM
i7 860 @ 4.02GHz, 4GB RAM, Sapphire 5870 1GB, Windows 7 x64

1680x1050, 8x AA, Ultra Settings
Average FPS: 56.23
Minimum FPS: 47.25

Bgretydews
02-13-2010, 01:33 PM
q6600 @ 3.2, 3GB Ram, 5850 @ stock, Winxp

Dx9 All maxed, 8xAA, Vsync off, 1650x1050

Average - 67fps
Min - 52

billsan101
02-13-2010, 01:46 PM
q6600 @ 3.2, 3GB Ram, 5850 @ stock, Winxp

Dx9 All maxed, 8xAA, Vsync off, 1650x1050

Average - 67fps
Min - 52

why you running dx9? i don't understand, the card and game are dx11. You should be able to get around the same fps with dx11 and it should look better.

trek554
02-13-2010, 01:49 PM
q6600 @ 3.2, 3GB Ram, 5850 @ stock, Winxp

Dx9 All maxed, 8xAA, Vsync off, 1650x1050

Average - 67fps
Min - 52if thats your DX9 results then you have some issues. I only get 2 fps less than you at 1920x1080 with those same settings and a E8500 and 192sp gtx260.

cody48
02-13-2010, 01:50 PM
why you running dx9? i don't understand, the card and game are dx11. You should be able to get around the same fps with dx11 and it should look better.
As he listed in his post, he's running Windows XP, which means he can't use DX11 mode. XP is strictly limited to DX9 and older, it can't run anything in DX11 or DX10.

He'd have to upgrade his operating system in order to run games in DX10 and higher. Which, really wouldn't be a bad idea considering the computer he has, it's almost wasteful to stick with XP on that rig.

billsan101
02-13-2010, 01:54 PM
As he listed in his post, he's running Windows XP, which means he can't use DX11 mode. XP is strictly limited to DX9 and older, it can't run anything in DX11 or DX10.

He'd have to upgrade his operating system in order to run games in DX10 and higher. Which, really wouldn't be a bad idea considering the computer he has, it's almost wasteful to stick with XP on that rig.

ya i actually knew that but had a blond moment i guess.. thanks

trek554
02-13-2010, 02:04 PM
q6600 @ 3.2, 3GB Ram, 5850 @ stock, Winxp

Dx9 All maxed, 8xAA, Vsync off, 1650x1050

Average - 67fps
Min - 52


if thats your DX9 results then you have some issues. I only get 2 fps less than you at 1920x1080 with those same settings and a E8500 and 192sp gtx260.

just following up and yeah you certainly have some issues. I just ran the bench at 1680 and I beat your much faster system.

DX9 max, 8xAA, Vsync off, 1650x1050

Average - 70.7 fps
Min - 59.0 fps

Bgretydews
02-14-2010, 12:39 AM
just following up and yeah you certainly have some issues. I just ran the bench at 1680 and I beat your much faster system.

DX9 max, 8xAA, Vsync off, 1650x1050

Average - 70.7 fps
Min - 59.0 fps

Well what could be my problem? I only got this card 2 days ago and been a little dissapointed with it really :/
Came from a 8800GT and my DoW2 benchmarks results only a got a tiny bit better, (min 14fps, avg 30, max 66, all maxed)

crypticspoon
02-17-2010, 10:14 AM
i7 920 @ 4.0ghx
GTX 260
6gb ram

All graphics on the highest- resoulation 1680x1050
38fps

trek554
02-17-2010, 11:45 AM
i7 920 @ 4.0ghx
GTX 260
6gb ram

All graphics on the highest- resoulation 1680x1050
38fpshow are you only getting half of what I am with my gtx260 and slower E8500?

crypticspoon
02-17-2010, 11:58 AM
how are you only getting half of what I am with my gtx260 and slower E8500?

wow i have no idea, i have a zotac 192 core
but that wouldnt warrent half the fps

did you run it on this?
"DX9 max, 8xAA, Vsync off, 1650x1050

Average - 70.7 fps
Min - 59.0 fps"

I had like 16XMSAAS ( or whatever the highest AA there is - this makes the biggest difference when i run mine at 8xaa i get ( brb go check )

ok im back, and tested

EVERYTHING ON MAX - including AA and V sync, and everything on ULTRA i get 28fps

with 8xAA, Vsync off, 1650x1050 i get 48 fps

trek554
02-17-2010, 12:16 PM
wow i have no idea, i have a zotac 192 core
but that wouldnt warrent half the fps

did you run it on this?
"DX9 max, 8xAA, Vsync off, 1650x1050

Average - 70.7 fps
Min - 59.0 fps"

I had like 16XMSAAS ( or whatever the highest AA there is - this makes the biggest difference when i run mine at 8xaa i get ( brb go check )

ok im back, and tested

EVERYTHING ON MAX - including AA and V sync, and everything on ULTRA i get 28fps

with 8xAA, Vsync off, 1650x1050 i get 48 fpsI wonder why you are only getting 48fps at the settings I get 70fps. not to mention your cpu is faster and at 1680 I would expect you to get at least a few more fps than me. :confused:

crypticspoon
02-17-2010, 12:18 PM
wow yeah thats interesting -
i do have a dual screen - but my second monitor only had task mager on it- so that shouldnt make a difference....interesting....
im gna go check my gpu clocks :)

Bgretydews
02-17-2010, 12:59 PM
I wonder why you are only getting 48fps at the settings I get 70fps. not to mention your cpu is faster and at 1680 I would expect you to get at least a few more fps than me. :confused:

he is running on dx11 though

billsan101
02-17-2010, 01:02 PM
he is running on dx11 though

a GTX 260 is not dx11 compliant.

grimgriefer
02-17-2010, 03:52 PM
My Gaming Rig
Intel Core i7 920 D0 @ 4.0Ghz
ASUS Rampage II Extreme
6GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3-1600
BFG nVidia 285 GTX OCX SLi
Samsung 2233RZ 120hz
Antec 300
X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
nVidia 3D Vision
Noctua NH-U12P

Playing DiRT 2 with the XML edit for high post processing effects on the 285's too.

Settings 1 (http://i214.photobucket.com/albums/cc202/diddler1979/Games-Colin%20McRae%20DiRT%202/01-Settings1.jpg), settings 2 (http://i214.photobucket.com/albums/cc202/diddler1979/Games-Colin%20McRae%20DiRT%202/02-Settings2.jpg) & settings (http://i214.photobucket.com/albums/cc202/diddler1979/Games-Colin%20McRae%20DiRT%202/03-Settings3.jpg).

Screenshots 1 (http://i214.photobucket.com/albums/cc202/diddler1979/Games-Colin%20McRae%20DiRT%202/04-Screenshot1.jpg), screenshot 2 (http://i214.photobucket.com/albums/cc202/diddler1979/Games-Colin%20McRae%20DiRT%202/05-Screenshot2.jpg), screenshot 3 (http://i214.photobucket.com/albums/cc202/diddler1979/Games-Colin%20McRae%20DiRT%202/06-Screenshot3.jpg) & screenshot 4 (http://i214.photobucket.com/albums/cc202/diddler1979/Games-Colin%20McRae%20DiRT%202/07-Screenshot4.jpg).

Test Results (http://i214.photobucket.com/albums/cc202/diddler1979/Games-Colin%20McRae%20DiRT%202/08-TestResults.jpg)

Average Frames = 102.3
Minimum Frames = 86.5

Furious_
02-21-2010, 11:15 AM
Hi

Im trying to test this game on my PC and I decided to make this thread so please post your setup and benchark result :)

PS. Its not a place to fight ATI or NVIDIA are better
PS1. Every benchmark count not only with HIGH fps
PS2. If u play this game post your benchmark ( no one will laugh or something !!! )
PS3. Noobs stay AWAY from this thread

I will start :)

Dirt 2 PC DirectX 11 Ultra Settings Benchmark 1920x1200

ALL .XML FILES ARE UNTUCH !!! NO TWEAKS OR CUSTOMIZE CONFIGS !!!

1st run:
Test system:

i7 920 @ 3.8Ghz
ATI HIS 5970 @ stock clocks
Asus P6T Dv2
12Gb Corsair 1600Mhz
Vista 64bit

Average FPS: 66.0
Minimum FPS: 60.0

2nd run:
Test system:

i7 920 @ 3.8Ghz
ATI HIS 5970 @ 990/1300
Asus P6T Dv2
12Gb Corsair 1600Mhz
Vista 64bit

Average FPS: 79.2
Minimum FPS: 71.8

screen:

http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/4452/firefox2009120604432619.jpg

I haven't read this thread, but how did you get DX11 when you where using windows vista?

billsan101
02-21-2010, 11:38 AM
I haven't read this thread, but how did you get DX11 when you where using windows vista?

vista has dx11 through the new service packs, im using it on vista x64

AussieSausage
02-23-2010, 07:53 PM
1440x900
4gb
5770
x4 620 @ 3GHz

highest was 61
avg was 42
min was 37

running everything ultra 8xAA

im impressed by my results :P

gore626
03-01-2010, 10:58 AM
1440x900, all high, 2x msaa.
x9000 @ 3.0Ghz
4gb ram
8800m GTS
avg: 37
min: 31

not bad for a 3 year old laptop.

Atranox
03-01-2010, 04:04 PM
Phenom II 955
Radeon 5850
4GB G.SKILL Ripjaws
Windows 7 64

1680x1050, ultra settings, max AA & AF, DX11

Average = 64.7 FPS
Minimum = 54.4 FPS

sikvdila
03-07-2010, 02:12 PM
hello

How I can run Dirt 2 Benchmark? it's inside game or I need additional soft?

thanks

cody48
03-07-2010, 03:04 PM
How I can run Dirt 2 Benchmark? it's inside game or I need additional soft?

thanks

It's outside the trailer, under the Options menu where you go to change graphics settings. At the very very bottom of the graphics options is a button for "Benchmark Run" and that will launch the game's benchmark mode.

shadowscreed
03-07-2010, 04:01 PM
yo what is the best settings for DIRT2? i am running on XP and a geforce 9800 GT ECO..i just bought this game..and i need help using the INVIDAS control panel..sorry if i am at the wrong place to say my peace..but its for the better anyway..u know a question that needs a answered..here are my specs.

Processor Information:
Vendor: GenuineIntel
Speed: 2672 Mhz
8 logical processors
4 physical processors
HyperThreading: Supported
FCMOV: Supported
SSE2: Supported
SSE3: Supported
SSSE3: Supported
SSE4a: Unsupported
SSE41: Supported
SSE42: Supported

Network Information:
Network Speed:

Windows Version:
Windows XP (32 bit)
NTFS: Supported

Video Card:
Driver: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
DirectX Driver Name: nv4_disp.dll
Driver Version: 6.14.11.9621
DirectX Driver Version: 6.14.11.9621
Driver Date: 12 Jan 2010
Desktop Color Depth: 32 bits per pixel
Monitor Refresh Rate: 60 Hz
DirectX Card: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
VendorID: 0x10de
DeviceID: 0x614
Number of Monitors: 1
Number of Logical Video Cards: 1
No SLI or Crossfire Detected
Primary Display Resolution: 1280 x 1024
Desktop Resolution: 1280 x 1024
Primary Display Size: 13.27" x 10.63" (16.97" diag)
33.7cm x 27.0cm (43.1cm diag)
Primary Bus: PCI Express 16x
Primary VRAM: 1024 MB
Supported MSAA Modes: 2x 4x 8x


Sound card:
Audio device: Realtek HD Audio output

Memory:
RAM: 3063 Mb

Miscellaneous:
UI Language: English
Microphone: Not set
Media Type: DVD
Total Hard Disk Space Available: 476929 Mb
Largest Free Hard Disk Block: 434842 Mb
Steam Hard Disk Usage: 1679 Mb
OS Install Date: Aug 14 2009
Installed Packages:

UWReason3D
03-13-2010, 01:55 PM
hey whats up people.

i had a really bad rig, bought in 2007 (worked well for animation, Penium D #.00GHz x2, 4 GB RAM on XP SP2&3 32-bit, 8800TS Superclocked.)

gettin my first few games on current rig:

Core2 Quad Yorkfield @ 2.833GHz stock on Zalman 2ball low noise cooler
Asus 750i (S 775) true Dual x16 SLI Ready
BFG Tech GTX275 896mb
Corsair TX850W
OCZ Titanium DDR2 800HMZ 2x2GB
Windows XP 32-bit (bout to order W7 Pro x64)
antec 900 case

benchmark on medium preset (need SLI to compete with these games):

<results samples="6182" min_fps="52.928394" av_fps="71.647102" min_fps_ms="18.893450" av_fps_ms="13.957298" />
</track>
</benchmark>

elusiveaura
03-23-2010, 01:11 PM
How much of a difference would I see going from a Geforce 8600 GTS Superclocked 512mb to a Radeon HD 5850. I dont have the OOOMPH for the 5870. CPU is 2.6 Dual Core Intel and 4gb ram, running win7 pro 32 bit.

billsan101
03-23-2010, 01:16 PM
How much of a difference would I see going from a Geforce 8600 GTS Superclocked 512mb to a Radeon HD 5850. I dont have the OOOMPH for the 5870. CPU is 2.6 Dual Core Intel and 4gb ram, running win7 pro 32 bit.

night and day, the 5850 would blow it out of the water. a 8600gts is a low end card, whereas the 5850 is a high-end (and new),

check this comparison from 2009:

tiny url.com/yjp8dn2 **remove the space**

trek554
03-23-2010, 01:17 PM
How much of a difference would I see going from a Geforce 8600 GTS Superclocked 512mb to a Radeon HD 5850. I dont have the OOOMPH for the 5870. CPU is 2.6 Dual Core Intel and 4gb ram, running win7 pro 32 bit.what is the exact model of your cpu? yeah dont even worry about the 5870 in your case. even with a Core 2 Duo at 2.6 you will limit a 5850 by a little and a 5870 by a lot and even more so in cpu intensive games. in realty with that cpu you would never see the real advantage the 5870 has over the 5850 anyway. I would certainly try and oc that cpu if you do get a 5850.

elusiveaura
03-23-2010, 01:40 PM
Thanks for the information guys. I don't recall offhand the exact model of my cpu but it's probably close to upgrade time again. I'm mainly a console gamer now, used to be hardcore pc but I've gotten out of the loop recently. I was hoping the 5850 would blow it out of the water and it sounds like it will haha.

Krystal666
03-23-2010, 03:01 PM
With Ati driver 10.3a beta on a single 5870 HD, Cpu : 3.07GHz Core i7 860, RAM : 4GB, Samsung P2450H 60hz - 1920 x 1080, Game all max out, 1920 x 1080, vertical synch on, i have :

Min fps : 49.9
Average fps : 57.6

With 10.2 driver :

Min fps : 44.6
Average fps : 52.3

Nice on a single card, but anyway, i used to play dirt 2 in crossfire mode, lol (60/59.9 fps fixed all the time during game), the purpose was to see how much frame we got in benefits (+ 5.30 fps) on one only single Ati 5870 Card with 10.3 drivers !!! :)

NitrousX
03-27-2010, 02:08 PM
Running on a single 5870 -

Min fps : 57.3
Average fps : 69.76

1680x1050, ultra settings preset

acpmadness
04-01-2010, 08:10 PM
No XML tweaks. Ultra Settings. 1680x1050 @ 60Hz

Win7 Ultimate 64bit
Core i7 920 D0 @ 3.6Ghz
6GB 1600Mhz DDR3 8-8-8-24 RAM
Radeon 5870 @ 875/1300

Catalyst 10.2 Drivers

Average: 65.6
Minimum: 55.4


Catalyst 10.3 Drivers

Average: 81.2
Minimum: 71.0

I was shocked the difference the new drivers made!

andrebrait2
04-05-2010, 01:48 PM
I'm using a GTS250 1GB here. With the Audio set to use Rapture's software, I get an average of 44 and a minimum of 36 fps. When I set it to hardware (I have a X-Fi XtremeGamer) I got 53fps average and 44 minimum! a 10fps boost from changing the sound system! o_O

NitrousX
04-07-2010, 11:03 AM
No XML tweaks. Ultra Settings. 1680x1050 @ 60Hz

Win7 Ultimate 64bit
Core i7 920 D0 @ 3.6Ghz
6GB 1600Mhz DDR3 8-8-8-24 RAM
Radeon 5870 @ 875/1300

Catalyst 10.2 Drivers

Average: 65.6
Minimum: 55.4


Catalyst 10.3 Drivers

Average: 81.2
Minimum: 71.0

I was shocked the difference the new drivers made!

Is AA turned off?

acpmadness
04-09-2010, 08:39 PM
Is AA turned off?

No, 8x.

Krystal666
04-15-2010, 07:24 AM
With Ati driver 10.3a beta on a single 5870 HD, Cpu : 3.07GHz Core i7 860, RAM : 4GB, Samsung P2450H 60hz - 1920 x 1080, Game all max out, 1920 x 1080, vertical synch on, i have :

Min fps : 49.9
Average fps : 57.6

With 10.2 driver :

Min fps : 44.6
Average fps : 52.3

Nice on a single card, but anyway, i used to play dirt 2 in crossfire mode, lol (60/59.9 fps fixed all the time during game), the purpose was to see how much frame we got in benefits (+ 5.30 fps) on one only single Ati 5870 Card with 10.3 drivers !!! :)

Update :

With 10.4 preview driver, core i7 860 overclocked 4Ghz with one Ati 5870 HD (gpu clock : 920 Mhz, memory clock : 1250 Mhz) and game all maxed out with vertical synch on, i have :

Min fps : 52.5
Average fps: 59.4

Everything's just nice, :)

rambo_cyber
04-30-2010, 11:02 PM
EVGA X58 matx
Intel i7 920 3.35Ghz
OCZ gold DDR-3 1600 3G
XFX HD5850 core :775 mem : 1125
Catalyst 10.4a

Dirt2 benchmark DX11

Avg 71
min 55

Jungli5t
05-01-2010, 12:46 AM
Intel Q9400 overclocked to 3.44 GHz
Zotac GTX 275

Graphics set to ULTRA
AA @ 8xQCSAA
Screen resolution @ 1680x1050
GFX1 (http://s3-llnw-screenshots.wegame.com/10-8093307652706340/8093307652706340.jpg)
GFX2 (http://s3-llnw-screenshots.wegame.com/10-5571054538750331/5571054538750331.jpg)

Minimum FPS: 65.2
Average FPS: 79.4
Results (http://s3-llnw-screenshots.wegame.com/10-4225169198473131/4225169198473131.jpg)

mudflaps
05-01-2010, 07:14 AM
x4 965
5770 crossfire
ccc set to default
8msaa ingame
1920x1080

all highest

min 55
max 60

vsync on as temps were scarey
about 100 fps is the top limit and average gameplay is about 90fps i would say. but as i said temps were in the mid 70c's so i stuck the vsync on.

but i am getting alot of micro stuttering.... anyone know if there is a fix for this??

DokoBG
05-01-2010, 04:29 PM
AMD Phenom II 955 @ 3.72Ghz (74 hours Prime95 blend tested "above normal" process)
Win 7 x64
GTX 480 @ 870/4400 (rock stable in all benches/games @ 1125mV)
1680x1050 Ultra, post processing on HIGH, 8xCSAA

Minimum: 74.1
Average: 96

Drivers: 197.55

felanoma
05-01-2010, 05:11 PM
I dont know how many frames i get, but the game run pretty smoth for me.

Everything on high as hell!

GTX 260
i5 750
2X2 1333 Kingston
Audigy 2 ZS
1920X1080
etc...

Cheers!

Duro_Dragon
05-02-2010, 04:33 AM
1680x1050 @ 60Hz

Win7 Home 64bit
AMD Phenom II X4 955 @ 3.2Ghz
8GB 800Mhz DDR2 5-5-5-18 RAM
HIS HD 5870 iCooler V Turbo 1GB GDDR50 @ 875/1255
Catalyst 10.4 Drivers

4x MSAA
Average: 102.2
Minimum: 85.0
http://i285.photobucket.com/albums/ll55/Duro_Dragon/DSC01679.jpg

8x MSAA
Average: 104.1
Minimum: 82.0
http://i285.photobucket.com/albums/ll55/Duro_Dragon/DSC01680.jpg

all high setting
Average: 92.7
Minumum: 70.2
http://i285.photobucket.com/albums/ll55/Duro_Dragon/DSC01683.jpg

175 FPS - standard setting
http://i285.photobucket.com/albums/ll55/Duro_Dragon/DSC01681.jpg

102 FPS - high setting
http://i285.photobucket.com/albums/ll55/Duro_Dragon/DSC01684.jpg

81 FPS - ultra setting
http://i285.photobucket.com/albums/ll55/Duro_Dragon/DSC01686.jpg

bes
05-02-2010, 12:01 PM
:D http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn134/BES12000/dirt2_gameFPS.jpg

Specs:
Phenom II X4 955BE(210FSB-@3360MHZ)

ASUS M4A79XTD EVO motherboard(BIOS 2001)

DDR3 1600 ram(@1680MHZ)

---pic of above overclocks: http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn134/BES12000/CPU-RAM-HT-FSBclocks.jpg

HD5870(@805/1175 (http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn134/BES12000/Videocardclocks.jpg))(10.4 drivers)

Game is installed on 4X RAID0 OCZ_AGILITY series SSD's

Windows 7 64bit Ultimate OEM
---------------
Catalyst Control panel settings:
AA - 24X edge detect
AAMode - Adaptive Multi-Sample
AF - 16X
Catalyst AI - Advanced
MipMap Detail Level - High Quality
----------------
IN-Game settings:
http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn134/BES12000/dirt2_gamegraphicssettings1.jpg
http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn134/BES12000/dirt2_gamegraphicssettings2.jpg

bes
05-04-2010, 10:45 AM
:D http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn134/BES12000/dirt2_gameFPS.jpg

Specs:
Phenom II X4 955BE(210FSB-@3360MHZ)

ASUS M4A79XTD EVO motherboard(BIOS 2001)

DDR3 1600 ram(@1680MHZ)

---pic of above overclocks: http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn134/BES12000/CPU-RAM-HT-FSBclocks.jpg

HD5870(@805/1175 (http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn134/BES12000/Videocardclocks.jpg))(10.4 drivers)

Game is installed on 4X RAID0 OCZ_AGILITY series SSD's

Windows 7 64bit Ultimate OEM
---------------
Catalyst Control panel settings:
AA - 24X edge detect
AAMode - Adaptive Multi-Sample
AF - 16X
Catalyst AI - Advanced
MipMap Detail Level - High Quality
----------------
IN-Game settings:
http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn134/BES12000/dirt2_gamegraphicssettings1.jpg
http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn134/BES12000/dirt2_gamegraphicssettings2.jpg

Woot! ..get higher FPS with leaked 10.4b/10.5 drivers :-P

http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn134/BES12000/dirt2_gameFPS2.jpg

Same exact graphics settings...

Straight-Laced
07-20-2010, 03:50 AM
Is this ok?

http://i390.photobucket.com/albums/oo350/696669/d2bm.png

Xile
07-23-2010, 07:33 PM
This thread is funny as all ...., so many fake scores, even Guru3d couldn't achive some that are posted here ROFLMAO.

Straight-Laced
07-24-2010, 03:05 AM
This thread is funny as all ...., so many fake scores, even Guru3d couldn't achive some that are posted here ROFLMAO.
Mine's genuine.
What's the point of adding a false score?
I thought the point of posting your scores here was that you can get help from fellow members, if you have a low one.

kaydee
08-28-2010, 09:47 AM
i7 920 @ stock speed: 2.67Ghz
6GB RAM
XFI Fatality pro
GTX 460 1GB SLI


average min_fps="59.576221" av_fps="61.721161" min_fps_ms="16.785221" av_fps_ms="16.201899


Vista Ultimate x64
Resolution @ 1600 x 900 @ 75Hz
Ultra settings (DX11)
AA 4X
AF 16X
Vsync on
Hardware sound

This one below is when I had 9800GT 512MB SLI.
The system setting is same as above, except this one is done with DX10 and Vsync off.


average min_fps="67.404694" av_fps="76.495819" min_fps_ms="14.835762" av_fps_ms="13.072610


Strange...

bes
08-28-2010, 01:01 PM
Bench result:
http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn134/BES12000/Dirt2/dirt2_gameFPS.jpg

In-game settings(all Maxed,except Vsync):
http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn134/BES12000/Dirt2/dirt2_gameSettings1.jpg
http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn134/BES12000/Dirt2/dirt2_gameSettings2.jpg
http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn134/BES12000/Dirt2/dirt2_gameSettings3.jpg

Catalyst Control Panel settings:
AA: 16x Wide-Tent Temporal
AAA Level: Quality
AAMode: Adaptive Multi-Sample
AF: High Quality 8X
AI: Advanced
MipMap Detail Level: High Quality

Specs:
AMD 1090T @3.34GHZ/3.6GHZ TURBO

ASUS Crosshair IV Formula Motherboard(890FX/SB850)

8gigs DDR3 1600Ram@ 1200MHZ 7-8-8-24-31-1T timings

HD5870 1gig GDDR5 @850/1200 with catalyst 10.7 Drivers and 9.12 CCC

8600GT 512meg DDR2 dedicated physX card with 197.57 Drivers,newest physX driver, 1.03 PhysX MOD

Game is installed on 2x OCZ_Agility Series SSD's on a SATA3 RAID controller

VIA/Creative X-FI onboard sound

850watt Antec Quad-Rail Modular power supply

Windows7 Ultimate 64bit OEM

ASUS 24" 1080P(1920x1080) 2ms access time monitor connected through HDMI

bes
08-30-2010, 07:55 AM
This thread is funny as all ...., so many fake scores, even Guru3d couldn't achive some that are posted here ROFLMAO.

Wow I didnt see this ninja post but all my scores are legit, you just have to know how to set your system up and what graphics settings to use to get good frames while keeping the graphics nice and crisp...

All the sites like Guru3D and such suck badly at benchmarks, only a few sites I know that have legit bench results with games and programs, they even properly tested a 1090T at stock, it didnt show a 1090T losing to anything, only SLIGHTLY to the Intel 6-core, instead of losing badly like most of the other sites..