ljbade
10-03-2010, 09:48 PM
Just noticed on the best overall time leader board the top two entries are:
Mr. Croft 01:15:32.047
Burned Churro 01:15:32.047
The times are identical!
And if you look at the profile they are both Eidos QA.
(The only two games they have are Kane & Lynch 2 and Lara Croft - the same pattern I saw before the leader boards were reset when most of the top scores and times were done by QA people)
I hope they don't reset the leaderboards again once the online co-op is released. My mate HAMFISH is currently no. 1 or in the top 10 for a lot of the leaderboards.
One more thing: take a look at best time for Forgotten Gate. My mate is currently 2nd, but the 1st guy has 4min faster which is bullsh*t. He either cheated/glitched/bugged or he is an Eidos developer who used noclip or something.
If you look at Inhert's profile he has ~100 games, majority of them have never been played and most for under 1 hour. So I don't think he is a real gamer. Maybe he is a Valve or Steam developer or tester.
Mr. Croft 01:15:32.047
Burned Churro 01:15:32.047
The times are identical!
And if you look at the profile they are both Eidos QA.
(The only two games they have are Kane & Lynch 2 and Lara Croft - the same pattern I saw before the leader boards were reset when most of the top scores and times were done by QA people)
I hope they don't reset the leaderboards again once the online co-op is released. My mate HAMFISH is currently no. 1 or in the top 10 for a lot of the leaderboards.
One more thing: take a look at best time for Forgotten Gate. My mate is currently 2nd, but the 1st guy has 4min faster which is bullsh*t. He either cheated/glitched/bugged or he is an Eidos developer who used noclip or something.
If you look at Inhert's profile he has ~100 games, majority of them have never been played and most for under 1 hour. So I don't think he is a real gamer. Maybe he is a Valve or Steam developer or tester.