Post your CPU-Z Overclocked

[DreDay]

A little update I'm still at 3.7ghz but with a multiplier of 8x. I can boot into windows at 4ghz but I'm having a hard time getting it stable. http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=410237

[Vinas]

Any idea when the E0 stepping of the E8xxx series is coming out?? Think they'll be able to overclock further?

They are out now with the e8600 and they do overclock better. You're not guaranteed to get a e0 with the older models yet (e84, e85) but they do exist.

[NitrousX]

hey Rafiq_kassam1,

I upped my rig just a bit. If it is possible, when you have some free time do you think you can update my link? Thanks!

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=344043

[Rafiq_kassam1]

hey Rafiq_kassam1,

I upped my rig just a bit. If it is possible, when you have some free time do you think you can update my link? Thanks!

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=344043

That one is not yours....that's

Intel® Core™2 Duo E6700 2.66 Ghz 4MB L2 1066 MHz @ 3.96 Ghz ~RobDawg~ (http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=344043):cool:

[Jesse1234]

They are out now with the e8600 and they do overclock better. You're not guaranteed to get a e0 with the older models yet (e84, e85) but they do exist.

Oh alright. I guess ill wait a couple months until im guaranteed to get one. And they'll hopefully be cheaper too.

[t4ct1c47]

New Overclock:

Intel® Core™2 Quad Q6600 2.40 Ghz 8MB L2 1066 MHz @ 3.50 Ghz ~t4ct1c47~ (http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=410878) Tuniq Tower 120

I'd nearly given up on the P5N32-E but the 1503 BIOS seems to have finally fixed this board's issues with clocking quads.

[Molotov]

E8500 @ 4.48GHz 1.41v

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=410173

[Rafiq_kassam1]

New Overclock:

Intel® Core™2 Quad Q6600 2.40 Ghz 8MB L2 1066 MHz @ 3.50 Ghz ~t4ct1c47~ (http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=410878) Tuniq Tower 120

I'd nearly given up on the P5N32-E but the 1503 BIOS seems to have finally fixed this board's issues with clocking quads.

Added.

I took out your Core 2 Duo...

E8500 @ 4.48GHz 1.41v

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=410173

Added.....

[borg_7_of_9]

Updated Overclock dropped the fsb from 1800mhz to 1600mhz and up'd the clock to 3.8 Ghz
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=414850

Keep up the great job jafiq

[Rafiq_kassam1]

Who is this "Jafiq" you are reffering to? lol Thx man. :)

[Molotov]

New overclock for you to add.

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=413929

Highest i can get on air. Hit's 72C when running prime! :O

SuperPi 1m benched at that speed (http://i362.photobucket.com/albums/oo62/MolotovXD/01Sep061407.jpg) :D

[Yob]

New overclock for you to add.

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=413929

Highest i can get on air. Hit's 72C when running prime! :O

SuperPi 1m benched at that speed (http://i362.photobucket.com/albums/oo62/MolotovXD/01Sep061407.jpg) :D

jesus!
Thats crazy!
what Cooler?

[Molotov]

jesus!
Thats crazy!
what Cooler?

Thermaltake Ultra 120 Extreme. Using 4 70CFM fans to pull heat away :)

[Rafiq_kassam1]

New overclock for you to add.

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=413929

Highest i can get on air. Hit's 72C when running prime! :O

SuperPi 1m benched at that speed (http://i362.photobucket.com/albums/oo62/MolotovXD/01Sep061407.jpg) :D

Updated...and Super IP added.

[X13_Y]

Here's one for you! Got a new processor.

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=416920

[Rafiq_kassam1]

~ Download CPU-Z 1.47 ~ (http://www.cpuid.com/cpuz.php)

* Intel Core i7 processor.
* Intel Core 2 Duo S Mobile processors.
* NVIDIA MCP79/7A chipset.
* AMD 790GX / SB750 chipset.

Exe file properties

* MD5 (cpuz.exe 1.47) : A7484EFA3C32BC968C248CB1237FF493

Add more CPU'S please. :)

[X13_Y]

~ Download CPU-Z 1.47 ~ (http://www.cpuid.com/cpuz.php)



Add more CPU'S please. :)

Add mine plox D:

[Yob]

~ Download CPU-Z 1.47 ~ (http://www.cpuid.com/cpuz.php)



Add more CPU'S please. :)

I need to hit 3.6 First!!!
:(

EDIT:
Ahhhh what the heck, here is where I am currently at:
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=421657

[Yob]

Add me plox!! :D

I would like to keep this thread alive for inspiration.

[Rafiq_kassam1]

I will update this thread when I get back. In like 1hr.

[Rafiq_kassam1]

Add me plox!! :D

I would like to keep this thread alive for inspiration.

You have been added.

[Yob]

Thanks!
I wanna continue to push, but I think I need a better cooler first. Wont be for a while then.

[L.o.D.]

I need to hit 3.6 First!!!
:(

EDIT:
Ahhhh what the heck, here is where I am currently at:
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=421657


http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=423694 :)

[Yob]

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=423694 :)

Ah HA!!! 3599.94 MHz Defiantly NOT 3.6!!! ;)

How are your temperatures under Prime95? and voltage and Cooler?
Right now I'm just afraid to push anymore.


Edit: Ahhh I see you're using water.
Yea cant afford that yet. :(

[L.o.D.]

Actually, it is but since the speed fluctuates, it took that at a bad time.
You wait & it'll be 3.9. :P

[Rafiq_kassam1]

Actually, it is but since the speed fluctuates, it took that at a bad time.
You wait & it'll be 3.9. :P

You have been added.

BTW: When I round it... 3.60 GHz it is. :)

[Rafiq_kassam1]

~ Download CPU-Z 1.48 ~ (http://www.cpuid.com/cpuz.php)

Improved support for Intel Core i7 (Bloomfield & Gainestown).
Intel Atom dual-core version support.
AMD Athlon "Kuma" processor support.
Alternate clock computation method based on "duty cycles" for Intel Core 2 processors (see ShowDutyCycles in cpuz.ini)
Exe file properties
MD5 (cpuz.exe 1.48) : DB78FBF1F99B7709240B495E59758CCE

[L.o.D.]

Did you want us to re-validate our overclocks with the new version?
I STILL cannot believe just how easy it is to overclock the Q6600 with the Rampage Formula.

[Rafiq_kassam1]

No it's not nessesary, but if you want to then go for it.

[canveyboy]

heres mine, on air temps 36-38c http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=434451

[st0ll3n_m1k3]

will get better but here ya go. :P a amd turion Yup aint the best mobo for gaming, but tis what I have, is a work machine, and have me games on it.. Plays all the source games with limited hinges, wish I could get better than 30fps in source games..

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=434709

[Rafiq_kassam1]

heres mine, on air temps 36-38c http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=434451

You have been added....

[NitrousX]

Rafiq_kassam1

Can you please update mine? I run at 27 idle and 35 load (on air)!
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=421929

Thanks!

[Jesse1234]

An overclock can 'degrade' over time right? A CPU may require more vcore to stay stable?

[rhalle]

Yes.

The motherboard can degrade slightly over time and the voltage it puts out can droop, so you might need more.

[Cloud*7]

what the difference between windsor and brisbane?

[X13_Y]

what the difference between windsor and brisbane?

They're different Architechture's for the cores. Brisbane is normally 90nm, but I think theres a 65nm out now. The 90nm Windsors draw more power (89W I think). Brisbane is smaller, and runs cooler, drawing only 65W. This allows for more overclocking potential.

[L.o.D.]

I would like to hear from those of you that have this combo & overclock & would like to know what you overclocked the quad to & the settings used.

Here's my validation page.
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=447458

[FITbmx]

AMD Athlon 64 x2 4000+ Brisbane @ 2.7 (http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=447469)


it took a little bit but i got it stable.

[HD580]

I would like to hear from those of you that have this combo & overclock & would like to know what you overclocked the quad to & the settings used.

Here's my validation page.
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=447458

Here is mine not a rampage just a q6600: http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=447483

I am also intrested in this too since I have run into a road block with my abit ab9 pro. It won't go past 3.0 GHz. open to other boards that would take my cpu above 3.5 GHz.

[Juggalo]

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=447492 Please add me

[falco217]

E8400 @ 4ghz

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=447772

[slayvus]

Intel Core i7 920 @ 3.3GHz - 1.08 to 1.14 VCORE(Below Stock)

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=453614

[br4dz-]

Q6600 @ 3753 MHz (http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=398395)

[nrnoble]

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=454009

[slayvus]

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=454009

Thats an underclock...

[nrnoble]

I'm working on it. :)

[slayvus]

i7 920 @ 3.48Ghz
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=457624

[L.o.D.]

Who here has their Q6600 at 4GHz???
I have mine at 3.7 but need to check the NB temp before I try farther. So for those that have theirs at 4GHz, what settings did you use?

[SmudgePot]

OC'ed E7300. Lowered to its 24/7 clocks and volts.

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=458635

http://img224.imageshack.us/img224/3650/36001200rz0.jpg

Setting which I used for OC E7300 @3.6GHz (360x10)

MB Intelligent Tweaker(M.I.T.)
Robust Graphics Booster ..................: Fast
CPU Clock Ratio ..........................: 10x
Fine CPU Clock Ratio .....................: 0.0
CPU Frequency ............................: 3.60GHz (360x10)

Clock Chip Control
Standard Clock Control
CPU Host Clock Control..................: [Enabled]
CPU Host Frequency (Mhz) ...............: 360Mhz
PCI Express Frequency (Mhz) ............: 100
C.I.A.2 ................................: [Disabled]

Advanced Clock Control [Press Enter]
CPU Clock Drive...........................: 800
PCI Express Clock Drive...................: 900
CPU Clock Skew (ps).......................: 0ps
MCH Clock Skew (ps).......................: 50ps

DRAM Performance Control
Performance Enhance....................: [Standard]
Extreme Memory Profile (X.M.P.)........: [Disabled]
(G)MCH Frequency Latch.................: [Auto]
System Memory Multiplier ..............: 3.33D
Memory Frequency (Mhz) ................: 1066 1200
DRAM Timing Selectable ................: [Manual]

Standard Timing Control
CAS Latency Time.......................: 5
tRCD...................................: 5
tRP....................................: 5
tRAS...................................: 15

Advanced Timing Control Memset
tRRD...........................................: 4 4
tWTR...........................................: 4 12
tWR............................................: 4 9
tRFC...........................................: 68 68
tRTP...........................................: 4 6
Command Rate (CMD) ............................: 2T 2T

Driving Strength Profiles
Driving Strength ...........................: 1066

Channel A
Static tRead Value..........................: 7
tRD Phase0 Adjustment.......................: Auto
tRD Phase1 Adjustment.......................: Auto
tRD Phase2 Adjustment ......................: Auto
tRD Phase3 Adjustment.......................: Auto
Trd2rd(Different Rank)......................: Auto
Twr2wr(Different Rank)......................: Auto
Twr2rd(Different Rank)......................: Auto
Trd2wr(Same/Diff Rank)......................: Auto
Dimm1 Clock Skew Control....................: Auto
Dimm2 Clock Skew Control....................: Auto

Channel B
Static tRead Value..........................: 7
tRD Phase0 Adjustment.......................: Auto
tRD Phase1 Adjustment.......................: Auto
tRD Phase2 Adjustment ......................: Auto
tRD Phase3 Adjustment.......................: Auto
Trd2rd(Different Rank)......................: Auto
Twr2wr(Different Rank)......................: Auto
Twr2rd(Different Rank)......................: Auto
Trd2wr(Same/Diff Rank)......................: Auto
Dimm1 Clock Skew Control....................: Auto
Dimm2 Clock Skew Control....................: Auto

Motherboard Voltage Control
Voltage Type........: Manual
CPU
Load Line Calibration ......................: [Enabled]
CPU Vcore.............. 1.21250V............: 1.32500V
CPU Termination…....... 1.200V*.............: 1.200V
CPU PLL.................1.500V*.............: 1.500V
CPU Reference...........0.760V*.............: Auto

MCH/ICH
MCH Core.................1.100V.............: 1.240V
MCH Reference............0.760V.............: Auto
MCH/DRAM Ref.............0.900V.............: Auto
ICH I/O..................1.500V.............: 1.570V
ICH Core.................1.100V.............: 1.200V

DRAM
DRAM Voltage.............1.800V.............: 2.040V
DRAM Termination.........0.900V.............: Auto
Channel A Reference......0.900V.............: Auto
Channel B Reference......0.900V.............: Auto

Advanced BIOS Features
Limit CPUID Max. to 3 ........................: [Disabled]
No-Execute Memory Protect ....................: [Enabled]
CPU Enhanced Halt (C1E) ......................: [Disabled]
C2/C2E State Support .........................: [Disabled]
x C4/C4E State Support .......................: [Disabled]
CPU Thermal Monitor 2 (TM2) ..................: [Enabled]
CPU EIST Function ............................: [Disabled]

[iStrive]

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=458663
E5200 @ 3.65 Vcore 1.305 in BIOS 1.28 in windows. 10 Hour orthos stable!

[Rafiq_kassam1]

Now Updating this thread.

BTW: What is CPU-Z? ~ Download CPU-Z 1.49 ~ (http://www.cpuid.com/cpuz.php)

AMD Phenom II processor.
New Intel Core 2 models.
Improved loading time.
New online validation process.
New Hall of Fame.
Exe file properties
MD5 (cpuz.exe 1.49) : B836E86B40D7AFAF99D9C512E8CC9FEF

[Beer_N_Cookies]

Nice i have been looking forward to decreased loading time.

[Rafiq_kassam1]

Nice i have been looking forward to decreased loading time.

Hey guys, I know I said I was updating the thread, but it never happened lolz. I am for sure updating teh thread now.

[Rafiq_kassam1]

Intel Core i7 920 @ 3.3GHz - 1.08 to 1.14 VCORE(Below Stock)

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=453614

You have been added.

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=447492 Please add me

You have been added.

E8400 @ 4ghz

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=447772

You have been added.

[Durial32I]

Mines underclocking atm rofl, its at like 1995 and it should be 2.66

Any tips just to get it up? (No innuendo lol XD)

[Va5h]

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=470894

Q9550 @ 3.902ghz stable.

[Rafiq_kassam1]

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=470894

Q9550 @ 3.902ghz stable.

You have been added.

------------

BTW: Many CPU-Z links are broken, if they are not fixed by middle of next month, I will delete them.

[rotNdude]

BTW: Many CPU-Z links are broken, if they are not fixed by middle of next month, I will delete them.

I don't overclock my PC anymore, so are you telling me that my results are going to be deleted or just the link? :(

[Rafiq_kassam1]

Umm, okay well what do you think I should do, just leave them???

[rotNdude]

IMO, the folks that have already posted validated links should be left in the list for their result, but the link replaced with something like "validated data has been purged" or some other statement. Overclocks tend to deteriorate over time with any component, just like your physical conditioning may deteriorate with age if you have participated in any sporting event. I don't think you should ask me to prove that I can still run a race at the same world record pace 2 years later, should you? That to me is not fair. We already posted our validated results, otherwise they wouldn't have been entered into the database listing you've been keeping.

At the end of the day, you're the keeper of the thread, so it's your call.

[Rafiq_kassam1]

IMO, the folks that have already posted validated links should be left in the list for their result, but the link replaced with something like "validated data has been purged" or some other statement. Overclocks tend to deteriorate over time with any component, just like your physical conditioning may deteriorate with age if you have participated in any sporting event. I don't think you should ask me to prove that I can still run a race at the same world record pace 2 years later, should you? That to me is not fair. We already posted our validated results, otherwise they wouldn't have been entered into the database listing you've been keeping.

At the end of the day, you're the keeper of the thread, so it's your call.

Okay true, I will keep them.

[FITbmx]

AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 4000+ Dual-Core 2.1 GHz @ 2.7 GHz FITbmx (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=473673)

Could go higher, but my ram isnt the best and wont boot stable with any higher clocks. The linked ram and cpu is really pissing me off....

[SmudgePot]

OC'ed E7300. Lowered to its 24/7 clocks and volts.

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=458635

http://img224.imageshack.us/img224/3650/36001200rz0.jpg

Setting which I used for OC E7300 @3.6GHz (360x10)

MB Intelligent Tweaker(M.I.T.)
Robust Graphics Booster ..................: Fast
CPU Clock Ratio ..........................: 10x
Fine CPU Clock Ratio .....................: 0.0
CPU Frequency ............................: 3.60GHz (360x10)

Clock Chip Control
Standard Clock Control
CPU Host Clock Control..................: [Enabled]
CPU Host Frequency (Mhz) ...............: 360Mhz
PCI Express Frequency (Mhz) ............: 100
C.I.A.2 ................................: [Disabled]

Advanced Clock Control [Press Enter]
CPU Clock Drive...........................: 800
PCI Express Clock Drive...................: 900
CPU Clock Skew (ps).......................: 0ps
MCH Clock Skew (ps).......................: 50ps

DRAM Performance Control
Performance Enhance....................: [Standard]
Extreme Memory Profile (X.M.P.)........: [Disabled]
(G)MCH Frequency Latch.................: [Auto]
System Memory Multiplier ..............: 3.33D
Memory Frequency (Mhz) ................: 1066 1200
DRAM Timing Selectable ................: [Manual]

Standard Timing Control
CAS Latency Time.......................: 5
tRCD...................................: 5
tRP....................................: 5
tRAS...................................: 15

Advanced Timing Control Memset
tRRD...........................................: 4 4
tWTR...........................................: 4 12
tWR............................................: 4 9
tRFC...........................................: 68 68
tRTP...........................................: 4 6
Command Rate (CMD) ............................: 2T 2T

Driving Strength Profiles
Driving Strength ...........................: 1066

Channel A
Static tRead Value..........................: 7
tRD Phase0 Adjustment.......................: Auto
tRD Phase1 Adjustment.......................: Auto
tRD Phase2 Adjustment ......................: Auto
tRD Phase3 Adjustment.......................: Auto
Trd2rd(Different Rank)......................: Auto
Twr2wr(Different Rank)......................: Auto
Twr2rd(Different Rank)......................: Auto
Trd2wr(Same/Diff Rank)......................: Auto
Dimm1 Clock Skew Control....................: Auto
Dimm2 Clock Skew Control....................: Auto

Channel B
Static tRead Value..........................: 7
tRD Phase0 Adjustment.......................: Auto
tRD Phase1 Adjustment.......................: Auto
tRD Phase2 Adjustment ......................: Auto
tRD Phase3 Adjustment.......................: Auto
Trd2rd(Different Rank)......................: Auto
Twr2wr(Different Rank)......................: Auto
Twr2rd(Different Rank)......................: Auto
Trd2wr(Same/Diff Rank)......................: Auto
Dimm1 Clock Skew Control....................: Auto
Dimm2 Clock Skew Control....................: Auto

Motherboard Voltage Control
Voltage Type........: Manual
CPU
Load Line Calibration ......................: [Enabled]
CPU Vcore.............. 1.21250V............: 1.32500V
CPU Termination…....... 1.200V*.............: 1.200V
CPU PLL.................1.500V*.............: 1.500V
CPU Reference...........0.760V*.............: Auto

MCH/ICH
MCH Core.................1.100V.............: 1.240V
MCH Reference............0.760V.............: Auto
MCH/DRAM Ref.............0.900V.............: Auto
ICH I/O..................1.500V.............: 1.570V
ICH Core.................1.100V.............: 1.200V

DRAM
DRAM Voltage.............1.800V.............: 2.040V
DRAM Termination.........0.900V.............: Auto
Channel A Reference......0.900V.............: Auto
Channel B Reference......0.900V.............: Auto

Advanced BIOS Features
Limit CPUID Max. to 3 ........................: [Disabled]
No-Execute Memory Protect ....................: [Enabled]
CPU Enhanced Halt (C1E) ......................: [Disabled]
C2/C2E State Support .........................: [Disabled]
x C4/C4E State Support .......................: [Disabled]
CPU Thermal Monitor 2 (TM2) ..................: [Enabled]
CPU EIST Function ............................: [Disabled]

is this going to be added?

[Rafiq_kassam1]

Intel® Core™2 Duo E7300 2.66 Ghz 4MB L2 1066 MHz @ 3.60 Ghz ~ SmudgePot~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=458635) (More Info) (http://img224.imageshack.us/img224/3650/36001200rz0.jpg)

You have been added...

[wierdo124]

I usually run 4.4GHz but i've hit 5 before. Here's an old one at 4ghz.
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=451845

[borg_7_of_9]

here is my latest cpuz overclock
Inter Core2 Quad QX9650 @ 3.82G 450Mhz FSB runing DDR3 1800 @Cl 7-7-7-20 CR1

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=507267

[Rafiq_kassam1]

Okay, will get this updated later on today

[Designs]

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=520463

My OC on a Q6700 *Air cooling* With Zalman CNPS 9500A LED
*Antec Formula 5*

i saw a list of Q6600's and NO Q6700's was dissapointed, Hope this makes it ! :P

[Rafiq_kassam1]

Updating....

[reVolt-]

my new pc

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=519906

[microjackson]

My first overclocking experience. Have been running my e5200 at 3,481 MHz for a week. Am thinking about pushing it farther soon. [290 x 12]

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=521283

[mejwidget]

This is also my first overclock. It's not much, but soon I may perhaps venture into 2.8-3.0ghz. Perhaps.

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=527494

It is running with stock fan and voltages, but that's not a huge achievement.

[RjAkaPeanut]

Intel Pentium E5200 @ 2.93GHZ
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=528064

[capncrunch53]

My overclocks aren't anything to brag about, but since I only see one Athlon X2 Windsor posted, I figured why the heck not? ;)

Here's my secondary gaming rig, Daedalus. Athlon X2 5200+ Windsor 2.6GHz @ 2.8, also 2x1gb DDR2-667 Kingston at 800MHz, and a 9600GSO @ 650/1620/950.

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=532126

[Arrowslinger]

Please enter me in the Steam forum overclockers thread under the catagory: "Cheap chicken**** overclocker" :p

AMD 64X2 5200+ Brisbane 2.7 GHz stock

CPU

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=532362



I use the bios AI overclock

I can get the cpu to 3.0Ghz manually but at that point the boot screen makes me press F1 to boot up. So I keep it the way it is :) very stable and no issues.

[Johnerz]

It s B3 core so not to sloppy :)

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=534248

[St00pid]

I'm looking at the top Wolfdale clocks and I'm wondering if the 4.4+ GHz overclocks on the E8400/8500s are 24/7 overclocks. I find it highly unlikely that the 4.7GHz E8500 is running 24/7, and if it is I'm wondering at what ludicrous voltage.

Here's my E8600 @ 4.5GHz @ 24/7 @ 1.34V

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=541930

Ignore my GPU stats, I have a extremely overclocked PNY GTX 285 and it sometimes doesn't report values properly.

[mikesin]

AMD Athlon 939 x2 3800+ @ 2.85 GHz stock voltage
on stock air cooling

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=542342

[1337Ace]

AMD Athlon 939 x2 3800+ @ 2.85 GHz stock voltage
on stock air cooling

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=542342

Nicee. What voltage you at? I posted mine in here but was never put on the board :P

found it :P

My 3800+ X2 2.99Ghz!! :P
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=261179

:D

[t4ct1c47]

Intel® Core™ i7 920 2.67 GHz 8 MB 800/1066 MHz @ 4.4GHz ~t4ct1c47~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=494200) TRUE Black

[mikesin]

Nicee. What voltage you at? I posted mine in here but was never put on the board :P

found it :P

My 3800+ X2 2.99Ghz!! :P
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=261179

:D

What are the temperatures? Idle and Load, and what cooler do you use? I would put mine much more if it didn't get too hot :]
But thats why im buying the CNPS9700 Soon.

[rotNdude]

Intel® Core™ i7 920 2.67 GHz 8 MB 800/1066 MHz @ 4.4GHz ~t4ct1c47~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=494200) TRUE Black

That is a nice overclock!

[cola1234]

Intel® Core™ i7 920 2.67 GHz 8 MB 800/1066 MHz @ 4.4GHz ~t4ct1c47~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=494200) TRUE Black

ERMMM can i has it? :D!!!!

[t4ct1c47]

That is a nice overclock!

Thanks.

I must admit I wasn't comfortable with the volts required at first, 1.4v, but the CPU thermals managed to remain within acceptable boundaries.

[Pepsi™]

i7 920 - 4515.31Mhz @ 1.45v http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=549603 air cooled with a xigmatek dark knight

[DorkSterr]

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=560058

[srg_shveazzenop]

i7 920 - 4515.31Mhz @ 1.45v http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=549603 air cooled with a xigmatek dark knight

holy shiz how hot dose it run

[Spenty]

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=560422
I ♥♥♥♥ all ^^

[bes]

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=582599
:D


I just changed the CPU multiplier, voltages are the same:
http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn134/BES12000/OCedCPUvoltages.png

[compywiz]

i7 920 - 4515.31Mhz @ 1.45v http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=549603 air cooled with a xigmatek dark knight

C0 or D0? And I can't believe you have that on air. +1 to temps please.

[Hawkeye127]

i7 @ 3.6ghz on air (TRUE 120 1366). Modest I know...
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=582819

[osldgoth]

Does this qualify as an overclock?
Q9300 2.52GHz
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=589242

[bes]

I wanna know why the front page hasnt been updated with my results...or the recent results?

I sense some slacking...if you cant maintain the thread after you have started it..then I vote that it should be locked..since this is one of those continual maintenance threads...

I posted mine on 06-08-2009 02:51 PM ...STILL dont see it added to the main page or the second list under it..

[Chaosrainz]

I didn't see any Q9650's posted up here, so I'll throw mine up.

Gigabyte UD3-R Mainboard
Intel Q9650 Quad Core
4Gb Crucial Ballistix 1066
ATI Radeon 4870
Cooled using single water loop

Validation: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=595357

[Rafiq_kassam1]

Hey guys....yeaaaaa.....I have not been here for quite a while. I will get the updates done by the end of tmw.

[compywiz]

Well since it's getting updated, I might as well put my mild OC up.

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=549526

[Rafiq_kassam1]

Well since it's getting updated, I might as well put my mild OC up.

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=549526

Added: Intel® Core™ i7 920 2.67 GHz 8 MB 800/1066 MHz @ 3.48 GHz ~compywiz~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=457624)
Added: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 3.00 GHz 12MB L2 1333 MHz @ 4.50 GHz ~Chaosrainz~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=595357)

[bes]

Added: Intel® Core™ i7 920 2.67 GHz 8 MB 800/1066 MHz @ 3.48 GHz ~compywiz~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=457624)
Added: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 3.00 GHz 12MB L2 1333 MHz @ 4.50 GHz ~Chaosrainz~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=595357)

could you possibly add a Phenom 2 section to the list? on the first and second posts or whatever?..

Since I did a pretty major overclock with a Phenom 2 955 Black edition 3.2GHZ to 3.8GHZ without a voltage change..

[Spenty]

AMD Athlon 5200+ x2 2.7ghz @ 3.2ghz :D

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=607119

[Rafiq_kassam1]

could you possibly add a Phenom 2 section to the list? on the first and second posts or whatever?..

Since I did a pretty major overclock with a Phenom 2 955 Black edition 3.2GHZ to 3.8GHZ without a voltage change..

Yea sure....

[Tufelhunden]

Are you wanting suicide runs or 24/7 or both? Suicide runs are a hoot!

[bes]

Yea sure....

lol..wasnt trying to be rude..but you said you were updating the list(finally) ..and I see lots of I7 but no Phenom 2 anything or Athlon 2.

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=582599 <---mine

Ill submit another one after I Upgrade my motherboard to socket AM3 with the new ram..

Unless my Overclock doesnt count? ..it should..

[johnytxtc]

Hi this is my latest PC that I have overclocked to 4Ghz using the Corsair H50 water cooler. Its all built inside an Antec 1200 case and works pretty well. I get 75c Peak on a torture test but when Im gaming its never been higher than 64c

Check it out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkdOK_uHMy0

System Specs:

Antec 1200 Case
Zalman 1000w PSU
Corsair H50 with added Scythe Kaze 1900rpm & Zalman Fanmate speed control
Asus P6T Motherbord
Intel I7 920 @4Ghz ( 191 x 21, 126250v)
12GB OCZ Gold DDR3 1600 @ 1531Mhz
X2 Asus GTX260 Top Sli
x2 Kingston 128GB SSD, Raid 0 Sripe 128k
1TB WD Green Hard Drive
Pioneer x8 BD-RW Drive

[Durial32I]

Hi this is my latest PC that I have overclocked to 4Ghz using the Corsair H50 water cooler. Its all built inside an Antec 1200 case and works pretty well. I get 75c Peak on a torture test but when Im gaming its never been higher than 64c

Check it out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkdOK_uHMy0

System Specs:

Antec 1200 Case
Zalman 1000w PSU
Corsair H50 with added Scythe Kaze 1900rpm & Zalman Fanmate speed control
Asus P6T Motherbord
Intel I7 920 @4Ghz ( 191 x 21, 126250v)
12GB OCZ Gold DDR3 1600 @ 1531Mhz
X2 Asus GTX260 Top Sli
x2 Kingston 128GB SSD, Raid 0 Sripe 128k
1TB WD Green Hard Drive
Pioneer x8 BD-RW Drive

just creamed my pants big time

[bes]

Hi this is my latest PC that I have overclocked to 4Ghz using the Corsair H50 water cooler. Its all built inside an Antec 1200 case and works pretty well. I get 75c Peak on a torture test but when Im gaming its never been higher than 64c

Check it out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkdOK_uHMy0

System Specs:

Antec 1200 Case
Zalman 1000w PSU
Corsair H50 with added Scythe Kaze 1900rpm & Zalman Fanmate speed control
Asus P6T Motherbord
Intel I7 920 @4Ghz ( 191 x 21, 126250v)
12GB OCZ Gold DDR3 1600 @ 1531Mhz
X2 Asus GTX260 Top Sli
x2 Kingston 128GB SSD, Raid 0 Sripe 128k
1TB WD Green Hard Drive
Pioneer x8 BD-RW Drive

I guess im a wimp overclocker.. my temps went to 110F when I overclocked it to 3.8... probably could have gotten it up to 4.5ghz but im scared to do that(dont wanna ruin my CPU..I never run mine past 110F)..

Nice job on that overclock ...post a CPU-Z validation!

[Rafiq_kassam1]

lol..wasnt trying to be rude..but you said you were updating the list(finally) ..and I see lots of I7 but no Phenom 2 anything or Athlon 2.

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=582599 <---mine

Ill submit another one after I Upgrade my motherboard to socket AM3 with the new ram..

Unless my Overclock doesnt count? ..it should..

nono, I am not mad :), sorry if it sounded that way.

[compywiz]

Added: Intel® Core™ i7 920 2.67 GHz 8 MB 800/1066 MHz @ 3.48 GHz ~compywiz~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=457624)
Added: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 3.00 GHz 12MB L2 1333 MHz @ 4.50 GHz ~Chaosrainz~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=595357)

Rafiq, I think you got my link mixed up.

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=549526

That is mine. It's also wrong on the main page.

Thanks

[Rafiq_kassam1]

Rafiq, I think you got my link mixed up.

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=549526

That is mine. It's also wrong on the main page.

Thanks

Okay, I believe I fixed it....

[compywiz]

Thanks, looks good.

[derek320]

AMD Phenom II X4 955 BE 3.2 Ghz @ 3.7 Ghz ~Derek~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=618558)

[f12dude]

Athlon 64 X2 4600+ 2.4Ghz @ 2.7Ghz

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=618954

[smash]

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=619078

i7 920 @ 3.5Ghz w/ Turbo - D0 stepping

[bes]

I just OCed my little gimp backup computer..

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=619085

[Tufelhunden]

I just OCed my little gimp backup computer..

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=619085

That's not a bad chip. I loved my E6300. Only chip I have ever come close to getting a 100% overclock on. ~90% 3.5GHz. Woot!!

[Scholzpdx]

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=619444

CPU Arch : 1 CPU - 4 Cores - 4 Threads
CPU PSN : Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q8200 @ 2.33GHz
CPU EXT : MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.1 EM64T
CPUID : 6.7.7 / Extended : 6.17
CPU Cache : L1 : 4 x 32 / 4 x 32 KB - L2 : 2 x 2048 KB
Core : Yorkfield (45 nm) / Stepping : M1
Freq : 3003.02 MHz (429 * 7)

Does that make #5 of the Yorkfield list? Its a 30% overclock on a quad, which is better than #4. This is my 24/7 OC btw, not a speed run of any kind.

[bes]

That's not a bad chip. I loved my E6300. Only chip I have ever come close to getting a 100% overclock on. ~90% 3.5GHz. Woot!!

yeah I dont believe in OCing by changing voltages..I OC all the way to it being almost unstable with stock voltage.

To me thats a pretty good stable OC without changing voltage..

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=619444

CPU Arch : 1 CPU - 4 Cores - 4 Threads
CPU PSN : Intel Core2 Quad CPU Q8200 @ 2.33GHz
CPU EXT : MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.1 EM64T
CPUID : 6.7.7 / Extended : 6.17
CPU Cache : L1 : 4 x 32 / 4 x 32 KB - L2 : 2 x 2048 KB
Core : Yorkfield (45 nm) / Stepping : M1
Freq : 3003.02 MHz (429 * 7)

Does that make #5 of the Yorkfield list? Its a 30% overclock on a quad, which is better than #4. This is my 24/7 OC btw, not a speed run of any kind.

Well he seems to not want to update the list...or hes so far behind that its too much work for him currently...so not sure when he will get to yours..since mine STILL isnt on the list..
I mean come on...a lot of the links are gone on the current list...they should be removed...since I cant see the CPU-Z validation..

[f12dude]

AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ Dual-Core 2.40 GHz @ 2.80 GHz
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=623093

It was really hard to get windows not to blue screen. My cpu was idling around 70C :eek:. Right after I validated my oc, blue screen!

[Rafiq_kassam1]

ah I feel so bad lol...I'll work on it right now

I am first going to make a list of all the people that I have missed so far, then I will remove any OC's that are broken, then I will add the new ones.

list:

Intel® Core™2 Quad Q8200 2.33 GHz 4MB L2 1333 MHz @ 3.00 GHz ~Scholzpdx~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=619444) - (Will Add)
AMD Phenom™ II X4 955 Black Edition 3.20 GHz 2MB L2 6MB L3 @ 3.82 MHz ~bes~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=582599) - (Will Add + New List)
Intel Core™2 Duo E6400 2.13 Ghz 2MB L2 1066 MHz @ 2.66 GHz ~bes~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=619085) - (Will Add)
AMD Phenom™ II X4 955 Black Edition 3.20 GHz 2MB L2 6MB L3 Ghz @ 3.71 ~Derek~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=618558) - (Will Add)
AMD Athlon 64™ X2 4600+ Dual-Core 2.40 GHz @ 2.80 GHz ~f12dude~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=623093) -(Will Add)
Intel Core™ i7 920 2.67 GHz 8 MB 800/1066 MHz @ 3.57 GHz ~smash~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=619078) - (Will Add)
Intel Core™ i7 920 2.67 GHz 8 MB 800/1066 MHz @ 4.52 GHz ~Pepsi™~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=549603) - (Will Add)
Intel® Core™2 Quad Q6600 2.40 GHz 12MB L2 1333 MHz @ 3.60 GHz ~DorkSterr~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=560058) - (Will Add)
Intel Core™ i7 920 2.67 GHz 8 MB 800/1066 MHz @ 3.60 GHz ~Hawkeye127~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=582819) - (Will Add)
Intel® Core™2 Quad Q9300 2.50 GHz 12MB L2 1333 MHz @ 2.52 GHz ~osldgoth~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=589242) - (Will Add)
AMD Athlon 64™ X2 5200+ Dual-Core 2.70 GHz @ 3.19 GHz ~Spenty~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=607119) -(Will Add)
Intel® Core™2 Duo E7300 2.66 GHz 4MB L2 1066 MHz @ 3.90 GHz ~reVolt-~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=519906) - (Will Add
AMD Athlon 64™ X2 5400+ BE Dual-Core -.-- GHz @ 3.10 ~X13_Y~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=416920) - (Will Add)

BTW: All links in the front are now working.

Edit: I don;t know how to seperate the different Phenom II Possessors....any help would be appreciated

[Rafiq_kassam1]

Added:

AMD Phenom™ II X4 955 Black Edition 3.20 GHz 2MB L2 6MB L3 @ 3.82 MHz ~bes~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=582599)
Intel Core™2 Duo E6400 2.13 Ghz 2MB L2 1066 MHz @ 2.66 GHz ~bes~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=619085)
AMD Phenom™ II X4 955 Black Edition 3.20 GHz 2MB L2 6MB L3 Ghz @ 3.71 ~Derek~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=618558)
AMD Athlon 64™ X2 4600+ Dual-Core 2.40 GHz @ 2.80 GHz ~f12dude~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=623093)
Intel Core™ i7 920 2.67 GHz 8 MB 800/1066 MHz @ 3.57 GHz ~smash~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=619078)
Intel Core™ i7 920 2.67 GHz 8 MB 800/1066 MHz @ 4.52 GHz ~Pepsi™~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=549603)
Intel® Core™2 Quad Q6600 2.40 GHz 12MB L2 1333 MHz @ 3.60 GHz ~DorkSterr~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=560058)
Intel Core™ i7 920 2.67 GHz 8 MB 800/1066 MHz @ 3.60 GHz ~Hawkeye127~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=582819)
Intel® Core™2 Quad Q9300 2.50 GHz 12MB L2 1333 MHz @ 2.52 GHz ~osldgoth~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=589242)
AMD Athlon 64™ X2 5200+ Dual-Core 2.70 GHz @ 3.19 GHz ~Spenty~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=607119)
Intel® Core™2 Duo E7300 2.66 GHz 4MB L2 1066 MHz @ 3.90 GHz ~reVolt-~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=519906)
AMD Athlon 64™ X2 5400+ BE Dual-Core -.-- GHz @ 3.10 ~X13_Y~ (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=416920)

Added:


AMD Phenom™ II Processor (www.amd.com/us/products/desktop/processors/phenom-ii/Pages/phenom-ii-model-number-comparison.aspx)

Updated:

~ Download CPU-Z 1.52 ~ (http://www.cpuid.com/cpuz.php)

* New design with "Graphics" tab.
* New 64-bit version.
* NVIDIA nForce 980a chipset support.
* Intel Core i5 and Core i3 processors.
* Intel Atom Z530, Pentium DC E6300 (2.8GHz) and Core 2 Solo processors.
* Intel P55 and US15W chipsets preliminary support.
* AMD Phenom TWKR support.
* AMD Phenom X2 "Callisto" and Athlon X2 "Regor" processors.
* AMD Opteron 6-core "Istanbul" processor.
* Improved support for Windows 7.
* New Intel logos.

[bes]

Thanks for updating the lists! ..ill leave ya alone now until I try it again :-)

[Scholzpdx]

Yay! #5.
10charbeccausemymessagewastooshort?

[cac]

I havent posted in a while and finally found my way to this forum again...I see someone knocked me off for my e6600 OC

Here goes my i7 920 @ 4.62ghz

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=833999

[Vinas]

Nice clocks, cac! Maybe I'll post my i7 860 soon... :) Looks like me e6600 score still rivals all of the C2D's here, that was a pretty impressive chip.

[cac]

These new boards are easy to OC...I remember when 400 mhz was hard to OC to..

[LifeTimeKid]

here we go

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=837417

[TreeRat]

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=844078

Phenom II X4 945 @3.6

[Sythedragon]

Well, I reworked the air flow in my case, and became determined to get a 4000MHZ stable on my 1055T.

There's no way in hell an average chip will get 4.2GHZ stable.
My temps were only like 38c on the false core temp reading, and under the CPU temp they were no higher than 55c.

Here we go.

http://www.upload3r.com/serve/090510/1273423728.png

[T Rush]

and it runs like that for 8 hours at max 100% load on all cores...good job

[notavirus.exe]

this makes me hate asus more...they need to hurry up and make some bios updates for their M3 series boards so I can even use that processor...

are you using the stock cooler for the 1055t?

did u just play with the front side bus n voltage to get the OC?

[Sythedragon]

I'm using a T.R.U.E Rev C in Push/Pull.
I've got 11 fans in my case.
Stock cooler can't even do under 55c at stock..

And I lowered the multi and upped the Bus speed.

[bes]

Well, I reworked the air flow in my case, and became determined to get a 4000MHZ stable on my 1055T.

There's no way in hell an average chip will get 4.2GHZ stable.
My temps were only like 38c on the false core temp reading, and under the CPU temp they were no higher than 55c.

Here we go.

http://www.upload3r.com/serve/090510/1273423728.png

I wanna see a pic of those temps..

[T Rush]

can you get your RAM to run at 7-7-7-21 at that speed(~700MHz/DDR3-1400) if you use 2T command rate ? or as that as 'tight' as you feel you need to go

what about that new CPU feature: turbo mode thingy , disabled?

[Sythedragon]

I disabled the turbo mode.

It's 6 cores at 4000MHZ.

I don't use Core temp, for obvious reasons, and it gives a false reading on Phenom II's.

I don't have to prove anything.. Phenom II's have a low heat tolerance, if it was above the threshold, it'd BSOD long before 8 hours of sustained load.

There's no way I can improve upon the timings further.
Although a kid in my class has CL7 1333MHZ RAM..

My RAM is 2000MHZ CL9, I used the 2000MHZ RAM stuff as that has the highest clocking ability, and as such, I was able to run high bus speeds, while keeping it at a sensible 1400MHZ at CL8.

[notavirus.exe]

Sythe does NOT have to prove anything. this guy is razor sharp when it comes to pc's.
I'll believe his claims as long as it doesn't involve gary coleman or 6k clock speeds

[Sythedragon]

http://www.upload3r.com/serve/100510/1273501497.png

A 2 minute blend.
Temps won't increase more than 5c.
But see the difference in Core temp to CPU temp.

[bes]

Had nothing to do with proving ones self, I just wanted to see, because I would have showed the temps if I were showing people such an impressive overclock..

I dont like overclocking my CPU's much so I went with a 3.4ghz overclock (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1173628), I didnt like the temps my NB was getting so I went back to stock..

Good job overclocking the 1055T, its not even a Black edition..

[Sythedragon]

I'm just L33T.
Which is why it was hilarious people doubting what I was saying originally.

1090T's achieve 4GHZ fairly easy, but that's because they're much higher binned.

[notavirus.exe]

So then sythe, do you think the 1055 or 1090 is a better price per dollar buy for a gamer, no encoding of any type, no photoshop or sony vegas.

I'm in the running for a "future proof" system, and by future proof i mean "high end" for at least another year or two

[Sythedragon]

The 1090T/1055T have no reason to go towards a gaming geared PC.

My mates Phenom II 940 at 3.4GHZ with his 4870x2 is still killing every game at 1920x1080.

A Phenom II 965 overclocked would last 2 years..

If you're set on a hex, then an overclocked 1055T..
The 1090T isn't worth the premium.. My 1055T is running the same as overclocked 1090T's... Alebiet, only achieveable on a crosshair IV.

[bes]

The 1090T/1055T have no reason to go towards a gaming geared PC.

My mates Phenom II 940 at 3.4GHZ with his 4870x2 is still killing every game at 1920x1080.

A Phenom II 965 overclocked would last 2 years..

If you're set on a hex, then an overclocked 1055T..
The 1090T isn't worth the premium.. My 1055T is running the same as overclocked 1090T's... Alebiet, only achieveable on a crosshair IV.

I agree with this, I have had a few issues playing games on my CPU unless I disable a few cores in the affinity section...

Since Turbo is disabled, I disabled it because its slower than my 955BE @3.4ghz VS my 1090T running 3cores at 3.6ghz..

Im also having issues with that Crosshair IV motherboard, your getting a 114.8F NB temp and mine is hitting 127F and its underclocked... I think mines defective..

[Sythedragon]

My air flow's insanely good lol.

As in... 11 fans...
Also, at the back of my board, I screwed the NB heatsink on tighter.

[T Rush]

The 1090T/1055T have no reason to go towards a gaming geared PC.
I don't know why you say that...as its my understanding that there really is no such thing as dual/quad "threading" only single and multi threading
...now sure, while a game might show most of the benefit with a second or third core...and ultimately performance may be limited by one demanding task which can only run so quickly on one of the cores, even with that other tasks(even including things not associated with the game) could be 'out of the way' running on any other more cores you have...no?

and we are only talking about a $200 CPU here
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103851&nm_mc=OTC-Froogle&cm_mmc=OTC-Froogle-_-Processors+-+Desktops-_-AMD-_-19103851
...thats well within the range that a gamer could spend for a CPU, what would any drawback possibly be?...saving $40 on a 955 BE wouldn't be that big of a deal, esp. if like you are saying, the hex is higher binned

I have had a few issues playing games on my CPU unless I disable a few cores in the affinity section...
. do tell

[Sythedragon]

I won't pretend I know the intricate workings of coding, but it's hard to make programs fully use 4 cores, let alone 6.

Cinebench etc don't count.

Also, I'm in the UK, the 1055T is 155-170 quid.
A 955 is like 120 quid.

Why'd they merge my thread?...

[bes]

do tell

Well Dragon Age Crashes constantly with 6-cores, unless I lower it to 4cores..

DIRT2 I had to make a custom workerMap4core that used 6 cores or else it crashed..

Those are just a few that I have tested so far..

Of course my crashing issues may have been caused by my below 8pin/4pin issue below..
-------------------

I plugged in an 8-pin connector for the ETAX12V, because the manual said the computer wouldnt boot, but I just switched to the 4pin one and now all my temps are lower...lol

Why'd they merge my thread?...

Not sure, mods doing odd things lately, its annoying :-)

[T Rush]

hmmm, with the change from 4-pin secondary ATX CPU power plug to 8-pin was designed to facilitate the move to multi(quad) core, tho many motherboards didn't mandatorily add it right away, maybe now it is necessary...couldn't the lower temps be a sign that your cores are receiving less(not enough) juice ? ...both too little voltage and too much can cause errors

[Sythedragon]

4+1 power phase design is fine for Hex cores.

[T Rush]

oh, its not how many MOSFETs you have supplying power to the CPU(but thats good to know that 4 phase will still work, where many these days are 12+) its just the 12v power cable/plug from the PSU to motherboard secondary ETAX12V(was originally called the "P4" sometimes when it was first added on mobos) ...today you find that most every PSU comes equipped with a 4+4 cable, so that it can be used in the older 4-pin plug or the latest 8-pin plug...I wonder if bes hex is alittle power starved if his PSU is dated enough not to have a 8 or 4+4 cable

or if the 6-cores are alittle too new and unexpected for gaming, and a few games(or Windows, or even the motherboard/BIOS) needs some updates/patches

[bes]

hmmm, with the change from 4-pin secondary ATX CPU power plug to 8-pin was designed to facilitate the move to multi(quad) core, tho many motherboards didn't mandatorily add it right away, maybe now it is necessary...couldn't the lower temps be a sign that your cores are receiving less(not enough) juice ? ...both too little voltage and too much can cause errors

Right now temps are all good, same with voltages, computer runs more smoothly now..

I was wondering why the STEAM forums were glitchy too, that works fine also..

But I think the NB temp will still be too high if I increase the speed to stock... computer runs fine atm with:

3291.1mhz core speed(core voltage 1.296V),205.7bus speed,1645.5mhz HT/NB,1645.6 ram speed

Under load:
CPU temp 99F
MB temp 88F
NB temp 115F
SB temp 101F

[lo3.explicit]

Asus eeepc 1000HE oc 1.6 to 1.8 (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1178751)

[DorkSterr]

CPU-Z Validation (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1177294).

Random snap shot
(http://img64.imageshack.us/img64/7131/randomxt.jpg)

[NitrousX]

CPU-Z Validation (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1177294).

Random snap shot
(http://img64.imageshack.us/img64/7131/randomxt.jpg)

Those 980's overclock like crazy ;)

Mine. (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=988605)

[boozer]

CPU-Z Validation (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1179049)

[Sythedragon]

http://www.upload3r.com/serve/110510/1273594309.png

Here's my final clock on my 1055T.
I've got the RAM running at a stunning CL6.

[NitrousX]

http://www.upload3r.com/serve/110510/1273594309.png

Here's my final clock on my 1055T.
I've got the RAM running at a stunning CL6.

That's a pretty nice overclock. How long did you run Prime?

[Sythedragon]

It started at 9:02 AM.. So 8 hours.
It's a 1225MHZ overclock lol, it's damn sweet, the RAM is stock CL9 too.

[T Rush]

yeah, that looks even better...could you list your exact parts list, mainly I'm interested in:

motherboard(any voltage changes there besides vcore)
RAM(voltage you are using with it)
and PSU
what HS/F with the 1055T CPU

[wing0zero]

That's sweet what RAM you got? have you gone from 1600mhz to 1400mhz to get better timings or does your RAM just do it? My timings are 7,8,7,20 1T @ 1600 (stock) and it does'nt like to go beyond that, if you put it on auto it goes to 8,8,8,20 1T, have you had to go from 1T to 2T also?

Never really messed with RAM so i dont know much about it

[Sythedragon]

I use the Black T.R.U.E Rev C in push/pull
A Crosshair IV formula.
2000MHZ CL9 Ripjaws... But the Thuban IMC can't handle 1800MHZ... So... running 1400MHZ at CL6 rips 1600MHZ CL9 to pieces.. Hell, it rips 1600MHZ CL7 to peices.
I'm using a 1KW OCZ ProXStream.

I'm running 1.675 on the RAM just for extra stability, I've upped the NB from 1.1 to 1.2v, this wasn't needed at all, I just wanted to give it the strength incase.

[notavirus.exe]

may I ask what type of fans you got running in your push/pull config?

[Sythedragon]

may I ask what type of fans you got running in your push/pull config?

Silent Xcilence ones. 44CFM.

I wish you'd stop merging my damn threads.
I'm trying to help other Phenom II clockers..

[rotNdude]

I wish you'd stop merging my damn threads.
I'm trying to help other Phenom II clockers..

Post them in this thread. Your bragging or showing off your overclock on a phenom II is common knowledge and you have done nothing to outline the intricacies of overclocking.

Don't argue with the forum staff. :(

[notavirus.exe]

lol your posts always get moved to places i dont look...

p.s. i sent off for my 955 BE today and I'm thinkin about pickin up that cooler you use, scale of 1 - 10 how hard was it to instal, 10 being a nightmare

[Sythedragon]

Post them in this thread. Your bragging or showing off your overclock on a phenom II is common knowledge and you have done nothing to outline the intricacies of overclocking.

Don't argue with the forum staff. :(

Parts were asked for, I gave them..

I do believe when the first Thuban thread emerged my "knowledge" was doubted.. I'd love to see someone pick up a 1055T and get 4.1GHZ on air, I was only able to get 3.9GHZ until I changed my method.

I've explained my voltages, my screenshots show my bus speed, Vcore, HTT, NB, DRAM...
The figures are in each on the screenshots..

lol your posts always get moved to places i dont look...

p.s. i sent off for my 955 BE today and I'm thinkin about pickin up that cooler you use, scale of 1 - 10 how hard was it to instal, 10 being a nightmare

The T.R.U.E isn't even that good, I only bought it as I threw 70 quid into fans and didn't have the money for anything better..

The Promilatech Megahealms (Spelling) is a very good heatsink, but requires a bracket.

The best is the Mega shadow.

The T.R.U.E's the easiest to install, and the Rev C has the best rention bracket I've seen and is truly tight.

[Washell]

I've explained my voltages, my screenshots show my bus speed, Vcore, HTT, NB, DRAM...
The figures are in each on the screenshots..

Overclocking is work in the margin. Margin on each chip is slightly different. Your numbers may be too much or just the starting point for someone else's CPU and are fairly useless in itself.

My air flow's insanely good lol.
As in... 11 fans...

Number of fans doesn't denote good airflow. Were you to use a smoke tracer you'd probably see a mind boggling amount of vortexes in your case, trapping (hot) air. If you plan to actually do this, use something that generates smoke that doesn't leave a residue.

[Sythedragon]

Phenom II's work on a VID basis.. The lower the VID, the better the chip can clock.
Ergo, no 1.4v 965 will take 4GHZ on air/water at under 1.55v, but my 1.375v one does at 1.5/1.475 respectively.

All my fans are the same, I've got intake and outtake..
4 intaking, then being pulled by the T.R.U.E and out.

Don't act pretentious.

Also, I've been clocking Phenom II's as long as they've been out.

They all overclock the same within a margin of cooling at the same vid..

[T Rush]

2000MHZ CL9 Ripjaws... But the Thuban IMC can't handle 1800MHZ... So... running 1400MHZ at CL6 rips 1600MHZ CL9 to pieces.. Hell, it rips 1600MHZ CL7 to peices. those 'numbers'(that you are posting in "MHZ") are actually "effective" dual data rates(so really it is "2000DDR" or DDR3-2000 that is rated to run at 1000"MHz") this is an important distinction(besides being one of my 'pet-peeves') because the clock cycle delay latency timings don't operate at effective dual data rate, but use the "actual MHz" the RAM really runs

while higher speed alone(like running your RAM at its full rated DDR3-2000 1000MHz speed vs only 700MHz DDR3-1400) will improve bandwidth of the RAM, and this is the max amount of data that can be read/written to the RAM(if that can be fully satureated by demand from the CPU and app running on it) it actually does very little for individual calls/writes of data(no matter how large or small), or how "quickly" the RAM is able to operate, that has much more to do with a timings to speed relationship... pretty easily, mathematically, we can get theoretical numbers to represent CAS 9 @ 1000MHz(DDR3-2000) vs CAS 7 @ 800MHz(DDR3-1600) vs CAS 6 @ 700MHz(DDR3-1400)

1000MHz/CAS 9 = 111.11

800MHz/CAS 7 = 114.29

700MHz/CAS 6 = 116.67

and higher values would suggest "quicker" performance

normally I look for performance RAM to operate at a relationship of 1 clock cycle delay(for the CAS, tRCD, and tRP timings... with the tRAS around the total of those three numbers added together) per 100MHz of speed(in actual MHz, not dual data rate 'effective' speed)...so thats why I was wondering if you could improve the performance of your original overclock with "tightening" the speed/timings relationship from CAS 8 @ ~700MHz to CAS 7 @ ~700MHz...and it seems you have been able to do better than that, and now are even "tighter"(with more voltage) than what your RAM was even rated for


(likely Sythedragon already knew all that, but hopefully that might clear it up for others that could question why running the RAM at a slower speed as he has done , with lower timings, might be better...but keep in mind 1000MHz/CAS 8 = 125 could be still better, using the full rated speed for bandwidth, with numerically more clock cycles as a delay, but those clock cycles are each shorter, thus the total time would be quicker for higher performance all around)

[Sythedragon]

The IMC limits my frequencies on the RAM.
And an AMD set up gains more lower/tighter timings.
Hence why I chose for the tighter timings over the higher frequency

[notavirus.exe]

T rush, I have a physics degree, not computer science. I'm trying to be well rounded without eating mcdonalds everyday...

give me a little bit to digest that.

For instance I have PC-6400 DDR2, 800 mghz. rather than explain it again, I have a thread in the hardware section, I can link if you want to look at my ram screen shot settings from AMD overdrive.

[Sythedragon]

PC6400 = 800MHZ effective = in CPUZ 400
Generaly comes in 5-5-5-15/5-5-5-18/6-6-6-18/4-4-4-12/4-4-4-15.

[T Rush]

I'll look for your thread (http://forums.steampowered.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1262897) .exe

And an AMD set up gains more lower/tighter timings. so should modern Intel systems now as well....it was really only the older "FSB" systems that continually 'liked' higher and higher speeds of RAM for more bandwidth(regardless of timings and their relationship to that speed) as they could benefit more from quantity of data with "smart prefetching" and lager caches to collect a good sampling of data that 'might' be used vs trying to do quick calls over such a long path

but I think my main point to get across is that "lower timings"(nor higher) aren't necessarily meaningful(no matter what platform) as you still have to factor the speed(which is the MHz of the RAM) each of those clock cycle delays are running into that...an example(if it were possible) would be "tightening" your RAM from CAS 9 to CAS 8 both at the rated DDR3-2000 would be even "quicker" performing, and have max bandwidth possible, than your great CAS 6 @ DDR3-1400 settings


PC6400 = 800MHZ effective = in CPUZ 400 yeah, but it actually doesn't work to use the term "MHZ" when talking about the effective dual data rate of RAM as many make the mistake of doing, as that is another trick of the bandwidth concept...for instance as a comparison: a motorcycle manufacture might want to say that they can move "people"(not a single "person") at an "effective rate" of 220MPH because a group of motorcycles riding together, with each bike effectively able to carry 2 people on it(just as data can be carried on 2 places of each clock cycle) can run at an actual speed of 110MPH, so that they could "say" people(as a group) are traveling at a rate of 2X the bike speed...but that wouldn't really be true if it was important to meet each person at the end of their trip, it would still take them(each of them) the same time to travel that distance if they were individuality going 110MPH(which they really are!) tho if there really were 2 people on every bike(needing the demand for people to totally constantly fill all the seats on the bikes first) it only might seem as if people were traveling a rate at twice the speed("rate" being the key word, which depicts more of a quantity in a given time, and is different than "speed") ..so that is why things like CPU-Z show the actual speed in "MHz" and not "rate" that a whole bunch of data might be moved...and since sometimes there might be large calls/writes of data(a group that could be traveling at a rate), or the need for a small call/write of data on the the RAM(which would need to happen quickly, and not a factor of bandwidth or how much) it is generally better to differentiate between "DDR" and "MHz" terms and not lump them together as interchangeable(effective ≠ actual)

now the whole "PC6400" adds another factor to the bandwidth equation, and that is bit width(64-bit that RAM uses is equal to 8 bytes) , that number is another theoretical effective "Mb/s" speed derived from this formula:
MHz speed x data rate x bytes = theoretical Mb/s
so:
400MHz x 2(dual data rate) x 8 = 6400Mb/s or PC6400 DDR2-800 RAM

again, to actually(not effectively) achieve any of this these interfaces would have to be 100% saturated, which only can happen theoretically, but any(and all) data really does move always at the actual MHz speed

[Sythedragon]

The IMC can't handle CL9 2000MHZ, let alone CL8 2000MHZ lol.
If my IMC could take it, I'd be at 1800MHZ CL6.

Because I'm on a 1055T, I had to bus overclock, my RAM's at the lowest multiplier I could do..
So, it's either CL6 1400MHZ, or an unstable CL9 1800MHZ.

[bes]

So far I like my ram at 1091.6 (6-6-6-19-25-1T)
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1180637

My Centon DDR3 1600 ram is supposed to go like this:

1066mhz
6
6
6
19
25
-----
1333mhz
8
8
8
24
31
-----
1600mhz
9
9
9
28
37

I try to move out of those and the computer will crash, but I can move the speed around to try and find the limit before it changes to the new timings or is supposed to change..

[Sythedragon]

http://www.upload3r.com/serve/110510/1273607330.png

[T Rush]

If my IMC could take it, I'd be at 1800MHZ CL6.
but I doubt your RAM could run at DDR3-1800(900MHz) with a CAS Latency clock cycles delay of only 6 counts
...if your RAM is now stable at 1.675vDimm at 700MHz with CAS 6 timings, I caluclated that as the CAS operations running at a factor of 116.67 throrectacl MHz speed(there actually are other factors involved as to what the rate of operations would be, that thats just a number to use as a gauge)...900MHz/CAS 6 would run at a much quicker spec of "150"...to run at 900MHz(that is if you believed your Integrated Memory Controller was capable of that, it might have something to do with the uncore multi to achieve that) and obtain that same relationship to what you are able to reach now(as far as how "tight" your RAM is running) it would only be a CAS delay of 7.71ish so more like rounded to CAS 8, not really near CAS 6, as that would be an exaggerated estimation of the RAM's capabilities, far beyond(much tighter than) what you are running now(equal to running less than CAS 5 at the 700MHz you are using now with your RAM)


the great thing about DDR3 and its higher speed, the factors of clock cycle delays(timings) become more varied, allowing finer increments to be used to dial in, where with older and slower DDR(1) you would see CAS delays of 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3 to try and get the best relationships with RAM running DDR333(166MHz) to DDR500(250MHz) speeds ... with the bigger numbers, there are more variations to play with: CAS 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, etc. with RAM speeds from DDR3-1000(500MHz) to DDR3-2400(1200MHz)

[Sythedragon]

I'm now at 1400MHZ at 5-6-5-16-20-1T.

I don't know the scienece behind it.
I just know how to clock and tweak and get the most out of it ;P

[T Rush]

you mean 700MHz(or DDR3-1400) but yeah, thats amazing


maybe back down on the CPU speed(like just lower the multi) for a bit of testing on where you can push the RAM to....like see how high of speed you can run and still hold onto CAS 6, or CAS 5 or 7 etc....take it to the point where it fails, so you know where it is...I'm curious now what would happen at different speeds

have you tried changing the uncore(NB) multi(or whatever they call it in your BIOS)...I think thats the trick for stability at those different RAM speeds, getting something that makes the other happy

[Sythedragon]

I can't up the multi on the RAM lol.. My bus speed's at 350.
I have a NB frequency at 2.8GHZ.

[bes]

:D http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1180847

RAM/NB clocks:
http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn134/BES12000/1090T%20Overclock%20test%20results/RAM-NBClocks.jpg

Video Card clocks:
http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn134/BES12000/1090T%20Overclock%20test%20results/Vidcardclocks.jpg

Test Results:
Passmark performance test,Cinebench...
http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn134/BES12000/1090T%20Overclock%20test%20results/1090Toverclock.jpg

3D/PC Mark Vantage results...
http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn134/BES12000/1090T%20Overclock%20test%20results/3DandPCmarkvantageresults.jpg

Multiple Process Tests...
http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn134/BES12000/1090T%20Overclock%20test%20results/Multiprocesstests1.jpg
http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn134/BES12000/1090T%20Overclock%20test%20results/Multiprocesstests2.jpg

Cinebench in action...
http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn134/BES12000/1090T%20Overclock%20test%20results/cinebenchworking.jpg

DIRT2 Bench...
http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn134/BES12000/1090T%20Overclock%20test%20results/dirt2_gamebench.jpg
1680x1050
24x AA
8xAF
AAMode = Performance
Catalyst AI = Advanced
MipMap Detail = high quality
---IN game settings
no AA
no vsync
everything else on max (ultra)

Temps:
Idle temp - http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn134/BES12000/1090T%20Overclock%20test%20results/Idletemps.jpg

Max temps reached during load - http://i303.photobucket.com/albums/nn134/BES12000/1090T%20Overclock%20test%20results/Maxtempsreached.jpg

[ExIlE21]

Hey guys, so I just got my i7 940 all installed, started OCing it, but was curious what everyone else is at.

Currently I am at;

3.44GHz Core Speed
CPU Multi @ 23
Memory Multi @ 8
Uncore Multi @ 16
Mem Timings @ 8-8-8-24 / tRFC 74
QPI @ 4.8GT/s
DRAM @ 600 (~1200MHz)

Just curious what everyone elses clocks are at to see how close/far I am from reaching a decent OC, thank you.

[lo3.explicit]

i7920
3.8ghz, runs happy at 4 but needs more voltage...3.8 is my everyday overclock, been at 3.8 since february.

CPU-Z Validation http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1341976

cpu is at 1.22 volts

by the way i am on water cooling. idle mid 30's prime95 mid 60's

[NitrousX]

Here's mine, i7 860 @ 4.0.

CPU-Z Validation (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1255596)

[cr1515]

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1356461

http://i283.photobucket.com/albums/kk305/cr1515_photo/overclocking/405GHZ.jpg

http://i283.photobucket.com/albums/kk305/cr1515_photo/overclocking/core1.jpg

Don't know why but after a few hours the temp started going a bit mental.
Solid though. I can get this thing to 4.1 easy, might push it up there tomorrow, got the day off.

[bes]

:D http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1350548 :D

[TBonius]

I couldn't have wished for this. On air with an ARCTIC COOLING Freezer 64 Pro Cooler. Cool, quiet, and stable.
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1419567
Do I have the fastest 955BE on here?

[borg_7_of_9]

I couldn't have wished for this. On air with an ARCTIC COOLING Freezer 64 Pro Cooler. Cool, quiet, and stable.
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1419567
Do I have the fastest 955BE on here?

4G on a 955BE hmm, Ill have to see if I can push my G/F's past that. Got it to 3.8G stock Volt's, Intelburntest and OCCT tested..
I wasn't even trying..

ok so here it is at 4G 1.395V (wow not bad at a tad over stock voltage)
might try a lil higher later :)

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1423624

[Coquito]

my Pentium 2 cant run CPU-Z :(

[borg_7_of_9]

my Pentium 2 cant run CPU-Z :(

That sux now don't it

[DorkSterr]

Intel Core i7 Extreme 980X @ 4335.42 MHz

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1424290

[mmstick]

Phenom II X6 1055T @ 3.92GHz. I haven't tried to go farther yet. Seems this CPU reaches up to 4GHz easily.
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1427666

[borg_7_of_9]

My OLD reliable X9650 @1800Mhz FSB 3.8G DDR3 1800 7-7-7-20.. Still chugs along..

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=507267 never did get to that Magic 4G mark :(

[borg_7_of_9]

wow ppl with rejected oc's are in the list, my oc has not been updated an the other half's AMD PIIx4 955 @4G hasn't been put in...

Where Is Raf he was doing such a great JOB..

[lo3.explicit]

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1596636
eeepc 1000he
1.6 OC 1.8ghz thru setsfb, stock ram, 100% stable.
eee pcs are a pain to oc but this 1 does fairly well.

[Capt_Spalding]

I dont know if this is "valid" or not but here goes.

AMD 965 B.E. @4.27 on air, stock fan

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1746681

[spichopat]

I dont know if this is "valid" or not but here goes.

AMD 965 B.E. @4.27 on air, stock fan

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1746681

Temperatures?

[Gorge]

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1747384

Noctua NH D-14

max temps ive seen (max stress prime95) has been 50degrees so i have some more room for overclocking... if i can keep the voltages stable :P

[Capt_Spalding]

Temperatures?


Idle 30c load 53c

[alberts00]

Someone could make a thread like this, but for GPUs :)

[PhamousVegas]

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1677309
Best I could do at stock voltage...

[Unclejunebug]

A modest OC to my Q6600 to tide me over until my next build. I haven't messed around much with the RAM timings. Might try and push those next.

CPUZ Validated OC (http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1650641)

[I R HAXSHOR!]

q6600 at 3.2 and loving it, just upgraded from a skt 939 a64 3000
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1749549
:D

[Particle]

The best shot I've got from an AMD CPU to date is 4550 MHz on a 1055T.

http://www.pcrpg.org/pics/computer/thuban_4550_cpuz.png

It was under dry ice at the time and stable enough for some Bad Company 2 action. hehe

[handi360]

The best shot I've got from an AMD CPU to date is 4550 MHz on a 1055T.

http://www.pcrpg.org/pics/computer/thuban_4550_cpuz.png

It was under dry ice at the time and stable enough for some Bad Company 2 action. hehe

Some high volts there, fsb too. Nice work on a 1055t :)

[ojibewa]

http://i53.tinypic.com/2j17cp5.jpg

on air - Tuniq Tower

idle temps 37/34/33/36

average load temps are around 62c'ish

:cool:

[DARKNIGHT]

Bump some up, also

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1804102

A mere 600mhz overclock, but i wanted to keep the volts down as much as i could, ive set it to 1.15 in the bios and my temps are still roughly the same as before, watercooling ftw.

Edit: Pic with temps..

http://img843.imageshack.us/i/overclockp.png/

[borg_7_of_9]

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1747384

Noctua NH D-14

max temps ive seen (max stress prime95) has been 50degrees so i have some more room for overclocking... if i can keep the voltages stable :P

not valid....

I wonder when raf will chime in

[Rafiq_kassam1]

Im here Im here :)

[Psychrophile]

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1967149

What makes an overclock "invalid?"

[borg_7_of_9]

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1967149

What makes an overclock "invalid?"

The only thing that comes to mind is a checksum that makes sure the software has not been modifyed to give false reports. Or an unstable overclock..

Nice lil oc haven't tried my hand with my new I7 2600K but I have the goodies to push it high, GB UD7 mobo and a real Water Cooler..

[Doc_Gonzo]

Here's my 24/7 Overclock: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1932019

Temps at Idle: 36,35,38,32
Temps under Load: 62,60,63,59

[borg_7_of_9]

Here's my 24/7 Overclock: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1932019

Temps at Idle: 36,35,38,32
Temps under Load: 62,60,63,59

I really need to give my CPU a bash nice oc what cooler?

[Doc_Gonzo]

Hey Borg :)
I'm using a Zalman CNPS10X Performa with dual fans and I'd highly recommend it as a mid range cooler. I can hit 5Ghz at 1.42V but the temps under Prime 95 get into the high 70's / low 80's. I've been told that this is okay but I'm just not comfortable with that!

Good look pushing your 2600K - you should get some great results with water cooling :D

[borg_7_of_9]

Hey Borg :)
I'm using a Zalman CNPS10X Performa with dual fans and I'd highly recommend it as a mid range cooler. I can hit 5Ghz at 1.42V but the temps under Prime 95 get into the high 70's / low 80's. I've been told that this is okay but I'm just not comfortable with that!

Good look pushing your 2600K - you should get some great results with water cooling :D

I'd still be happy in the high 70s I don't think I'd like low 80s ether, but I wouldn't try pushing more than 1.4v iirc that's the Max V core for most Intel cpu's going back to the core 2 days.. Best to be save than sorry..

[Doc_Gonzo]

I'd still be happy in the high 70s I don't think I'd like low 80s ether, but I wouldn't try pushing more than 1.4v iirc that's the Max V core for most Intel cpu's going back to the core 2 days.. Best to be save than sorry..

Totally agree, anything in the 80's makes me rather nervous as to the affects it would have long term, as does anything over 1.4V!
I've read on another forum that these CPU'S are safe up to 1.52V, but nobody actually recommends that but I've seen people pushing them past 5Ghz with 1.5V +.
Bottom line is that nobody knows the long term affects and possible degradation as the CPU'S haven't been out long enough yet.

Just out of Curiosity, where would you take your voltage reading from? I go by CPU-Z but in the Bios my Vcore is set to 1.410V and at 5Ghz it's at 1.45V in the Bios (1.42V CPU-Z)

[borg_7_of_9]

Totally agree, anything in the 80's makes me rather nervous as to the affects it would have long term, as does anything over 1.4V!as a rule BIOS is more accurate.
I've read on another forum that these CPU'S are safe up to 1.52V, but nobody actually recommends that but I've seen people pushing them past 5Ghz with 1.5V +.
Bottom line is that nobody knows the long term affects and possible degradation as the CPU'S haven't been out long enough yet.

Just out of Curiosity, where would you take your voltage reading from? I go by CPU-Z but in the Bios my Vcore is set to 1.410V and at 5Ghz it's at 1.45V in the Bios (1.42V CPU-Z)

As a rule BIOS is more accurate.. Software often needs updates with new boards to display correct readings..

[Doc_Gonzo]

As a rule BIOS is more accurate.. Software often needs updates with new boards to display correct readings..

Thanks, I think I'll take my chances with being slightly over 1.4V in the BIOS. . . . . and just hope my CPU doesn't die in a year :eek: LOL!

[borg_7_of_9]

Thanks, I think I'll take my chances with being slightly over 1.4V in the BIOS. . . . . and just hope my CPU doesn't die in a year :eek: LOL!

Np mate cheers Jay

[Snuffleupagus]

Suppose I'll be the first oldschool i5 (45nm) to enter this party :P

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1477826

[sean_blaik]

This is my old board with CPU(just got a i5 2500k :D )

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1925161

My i5 is kind of hot on my P67 Sabertooth :D is this normal?
Shoots up to the 90's with in seconds.

and I can't play any game till I get a cooler, making it a really expensive office PC.

Can anyone recommend me a Air cooler (in the UK)?

[divine_skills]

This is my old board with CPU(just got a i5 2500k :D )

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1925161

My i5 is kind of hot on my P67 Sabertooth :D is this normal?
Shoots up to the 90's with in seconds.

and I can't play any game till I get a cooler, making it a really expensive office PC.

Can anyone recommend me a Air cooler (in the UK)?
My CoolerMaster Hyper 212 plus keeps my 4.2ghz Core i5-2500K under 70c. Great budget cooler.

Thinking about replacing the stock fan with a Gentle Typhoon.

[sean_blaik]

My CoolerMaster Hyper 212 plus keeps my 4.2ghz Core i5-2500K under 70c. Great budget cooler.

Thinking about replacing the stock fan with a Gentle Typhoon.

Thanks I hear great things about the Hyper 212.

[themires]

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1925500

[hahahehe]

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1968705

[Psychrophile]

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1967149

What makes an overclock "invalid?"For reference, I get up to about 72C (max) running Prime95; air-cooling (Hyper 212+).

[Gorge]

The only thing that comes to mind is a checksum that makes sure the software has not been modifyed to give false reports. Or an unstable overclock..



my OC was actually valid, it might not have shown properly but i have been running it for around 2-3months fine.

[borg_7_of_9]

Gave the I7 2600K a quick OC this morning 4.5G 54c Max at 1.044V http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1972284

[sean_blaik]

Just got settled in with my i5 2500k. 4.5Ghz Temps never goes above 60

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1985223

Edit: I noted that my V core is higher than your is that because of the CPU or my mobo vs your Mobo

[divine_skills]

Gave the I7 2600K a quick OC this morning 4.5G 54c Max at 1.044V http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1972284
You must have gotten a really good chip if it runs 4.5gHz under 1.2 volts !

[borg_7_of_9]

You must have gotten a really good chip if it runs 4.5gHz under 1.2 volts !

Or A really high end mobo that can deliver the juice..

[sean_blaik]

Or A really high end mobo that can deliver the juice..

I see you get what you paid for I guess. Nice OC :D

[divine_skills]

Or A really high end mobo that can deliver the juice..
Or inaccurate readings.

[borg_7_of_9]

I see you get what you paid for I guess. Nice OC :D
Punched in 45 ,level 1 and bang there prime95 stable..

I know how to OC so that will test my skills when I try push 5G, had a QX9650 with DDR 3 1800, but getting the quad to 1800MHz FSB was tricky as was getting it stable at 4G..

I'd have to say that with over clocking it helps to pay a lil extra for a quality board.. Z68X-UD7

[General Jameson]

My CoolerMaster Hyper 212 plus keeps my 4.2ghz Core i5-2500K under 70c. Great budget cooler.

Thinking about replacing the stock fan with a Gentle Typhoon.

I have two of these on my Hyper 212+ running @ 1800RPM, its not louder than my GPU when the fans spins up. Great heatsink keeps my Phenom II 1090t @ 3960mhz running 100% and under 54c on the hottest of summer days. Good case ventilation is necessary of course.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811999479

[Doc_Gonzo]

Cranking up my i5 2500K

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1986399

5Ghz @ 1.448V. Prime 95 stable but temps are uncomfortable for me - 80's under load. It boots into Windows at 1.42V but is not stable and crashes under load.

[borg_7_of_9]

Cranking up my i5 2500K

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1986399

5Ghz @ 1.448V. Prime 95 stable but temps are uncomfortable for me - 80's under load. It boots into Windows at 1.42V but is not stable and crashes under load.

Man u are gain I'd never go past 1.4v and personally only did 1.4v once BIOS auto set it that high :eek: the Max for my CPU then was 1.3625 iirc but 1.4 was concidered safe in the oc community..

Intel QX9650 back then FWIW

[Doc_Gonzo]

Over on OCN, people are split between 1.4V and 1.45V being the safe maximum for 24/7 use and plenty of people are using higher voltages than that for 24/7 use :eek: lol!!
You've got a golden chip Jay - I haven't seen anyone get to 4.5Ghz with a 2600K on such a low Voltage :D
Your chip is just begging to be pushed beyond 5Ghz. . . . or is it just me? :p

[borg_7_of_9]

Maybe 1.04 is very good @4.5G but is it the chip or the combo, more testing on the weekend I think I have the cooling for it..

[Doc_Gonzo]

Maybe 1.04 is very good @4.5G but is it the chip or the combo, more testing on the weekend I think I have the cooling for it..

Having a good combo is definitely a bonus, but I'd still say that chip was "Golden" - Congratulations on winning the CPU lottery!

Check out the Sandy Bridge Stable thread over here to see what others are running: http://www.overclock.net/intel-cpus/968053-official-sandy-stable-club-benchmarks-stable.html:
Craig

[borg_7_of_9]

Having a good combo is definitely a bonus, but I'd still say that chip was "Golden" - Congratulations on winning the CPU lottery!

Check out the Sandy Bridge Stable thread over here to see what others are running: http://www.overclock.net/intel-cpus/968053-official-sandy-stable-club-benchmarks-stable.html:
Craig

Thanks will do Craig, cheers

[divine_skills]

I have two of these on my Hyper 212+ running @ 1800RPM, its not louder than my GPU when the fans spins up. Great heatsink keeps my Phenom II 1090t @ 3960mhz running 100% and under 54c on the hottest of summer days. Good case ventilation is necessary of course.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811999479
Just got 2x 1150 RPM Gentle Typhoons to cool the thing down. Temps are the same but I can't hear the thing anymore :cool:

[jmaster299]

I see this thread has been quiet for a while so I guess I'll start it up since I have a new, and good, rig.

He's my CPU-Z validation http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2168725

At 4.4GHz during a full stress test I stayed below 60c using a Corsair A70.

Also @borg, with your OC at only 1.05v there is such a thing as too low of a voltage. You can set the multiplier to what ever you want but if you voltage is too low the OC will not be stable. Have you done any extensive stress test with something like Prime95?

Edit:
Just for reference my full system specs:
CM 942 HAF X
ASUS P8Z78 V-Pro
i7 2600K (4.4GHz)
Corsair A70
8GB DDR3 1600MHz Corsair Vengeance RAM
EVGA GTX570 2.5GB
Corsair 1050HX (over kill on PSU since I will be getting a second 570 soon)

[borg_7_of_9]

I see this thread has been quiet for a while so I guess I'll start it up since I have a new, and good, rig.

He's my CPU-Z validation http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2168725

At 4.4GHz during a full stress test I stayed below 60c using a Corsair A70.

Also @borg, with your OC at only 1.05v there is such a thing as too low of a voltage. You can set the multiplier to what ever you want but if you voltage is too low the OC will not be stable. Have you done any extensive stress test with something like Prime95?

Edit:
Just for reference my full system specs:
CM 942 HAF X
ASUS P8Z78 V-Pro
i7 2600K (4.4GHz)
Corsair A70
8GB DDR3 1600MHz Corsair Vengeance RAM
EVGA GTX570 2.5GB
Corsair 1050HX (over kill on PSU since I will be getting a second 570 soon)

Didn't you see the prine95 tested on the previous page.. I've been over clocking for a while n I have the tools so to speak no such thing as to low on voltage as long as its stable..but as I pointed out the voltage may be incorrect it would seem there's is a problem with cpu-z possibly...

Cheers n happy new year

[Zodiark1593]

Since I have no way of overclocking my laptop CPU, I suppose the GPU will have to do. -_-

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/341/captureydm.jpg/

[Maxi]

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2174679

Probably going to pick up an Ivy Bridge when they are released though.

[jmaster299]

Didn't you see the prine95 tested on the previous page.. I've been over clocking for a while n I have the tools so to speak no such thing as to low on voltage as long as its stable..but as I pointed out the voltage may be incorrect it would seem there's is a problem with cpu-z possibly...

Cheers n happy new year

No I did not see that other post about Prime95 and yes I was only saying voltage can be too low if it's not stable. Also some people don't run their stress tests long enough.

I ran two Prime95 stress tests on my own OC. I did one test for an hour then switched to some other stress tests like benchmarking with 3DMark and several different games. At the end of the night I let Prime95 run again while I was sleeping.

What did you set your voltage to in your BIOS? That's the voltage reading I would go by over CPU-Z. I know for mine I specifically set it to 1.33v and CPU-Z fluctuates slightly from that but for your OC to be stable and just barely over 1.0v is just unheard of. Gratz to you if it really is!

[borg_7_of_9]

No I did not see that other post about Prime95 and yes I was only saying voltage can be too low if it's not stable. Also some people don't run their stress tests long enough.

I ran two Prime95 stress tests on my own OC. I did one test for an hour then switched to some other stress tests like benchmarking with 3DMark and several different games. At the end of the night I let Prime95 run again while I was sleeping.

What did you set your voltage to in your BIOS? That's the voltage reading I would go by over CPU-Z. I know for mine I specifically set it to 1.33v and CPU-Z fluctuates slightly from that but for your OC to be stable and just barely over 1.0v is just unheard of. Gratz to you if it really is!

left it stock so it's unknown just up'd the Multi Steps Load line to level 1, I need to get back in to OC'ing this sucker to find out but with the I7 2600K i really don't need any more grunt..

Also I run a water loop to keep things cool..

[Overclocker_]

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2175290

Just took the #1 spot for Deneb, thank you very much :)

PS, my chip is nothing compared to my firends' 965BE that does 4GHz at 1.36v - he took the #1 spot on hwbot for the 965BE, at 5.8Ghz under DICE.

[jmaster299]

left it stock so it's unknown just up'd the Multi Steps Load line to level 1, I need to get back in to OC'ing this sucker to find out but with the I7 2600K i really don't need any more grunt..

Also I run a water loop to keep things cool..

Water cooling does not always have better temps. The A70 beats things like the H60 and H80 and the D14 beats the H100. Water cooling is also louder and reduces your over all case air flow.

Under the full stress test my A70 kept my i7 at 4.4GHz at or below 60c and in games like MW3 or BF3 I sit close to 50c.

[borg_7_of_9]

Water cooling does not always have better temps. The A70 beats things like the H60 and H80 and the D14 beats the H100. Water cooling is also louder and reduces your over all case air flow.

Under the full stress test my A70 kept my i7 at 4.4GHz at or below 60c and in games like MW3 or BF3 I sit close to 50c.

well I wouldn't call sealed units water cooling and I doubt it's affected my air flow that much may have improved air flow in my case so the air flow thing is a load of BS IMO

[borg_7_of_9]

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2175290

Just took the #1 spot for Deneb, thank you very much :)

PS, my chip is nothing compared to my firends' 965BE that does 4GHz at 1.36v - he took the #1 spot on hwbot for the 965BE, at 5.8Ghz under DICE.

How do you work that out 4G has been done plenty of time's before you and at lower voltages here is a link to my post a few months back 10-08-2010 at 02:11 PM http://forums.steampowered.com/forums/showpost.php?p=17390486&postcount=1436 (perhaps I should have said 1 year back lol)

The G/F's rig just for fun. Prime 95 tested at a much lower voltage.. And the same CPU as you..