Go Back   Steam Users' Forums > Steam Discussions > Hardware and Operating Systems

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-29-2012, 03:12 PM   #1
dachshundfan
 
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Reputation: 476
Posts: 466
GTX 680 4gb or just get a 2gb?

would it really help if i get a 4gb over a 2gb card? its hard enough trying to find a 2gb let alone when the 4gb models come out. are there any games that it would help in? i dont plan to add an extra monitor any time soon.
dachshundfan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2012, 03:13 PM   #2
madpistol
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Reputation: 923
Posts: 4,125
The performance difference between the 2GB and 4GB model is non-existent.

Save your money, and get the 2GB model.
madpistol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2012, 03:20 PM   #3
Mr. Hard Reset
 
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Reputation: 0
Posts: 31
Wouldn't it just help if you have a massive monitor?
Mr. Hard Reset is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2012, 03:21 PM   #4
madpistol
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Reputation: 923
Posts: 4,125
No it won't. Not right now it won't.
madpistol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2012, 03:26 PM   #5
imeem
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Reputation: 779
Posts: 2,768
most likely by the time you need 4 GB VRAM for gaming, the video card is gonna be too slow.
imeem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2012, 01:59 AM   #6
Illutian
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Reputation: 0
Posts: 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by imeem View Post
most likely by the time you need 4 GB VRAM for gaming, the video card is gonna be too slow.
My Skyrim uses 1.1 GB of VRAM running at 1680x1050 with a minor-tweaked 'High' level (edits to SkyrimPref.ini & Skyrim.ini). The extra megs comes from the fact that Skyrim Vanilla is completely unacceptable for a "2011 Game"..maybe for a "2007 Game". F-ing consoles

And the best part is...I haven't even installed Skyrim HD's textures.


FYI: BF3 running on 'High' hits ~850MB

Take away: Go with a 3GB (per GPU) or more card. Right now a GTX 570 can handle any of the games in terms of processing power. The bottleneck is in the VRAM.



Skyrim, how it was meant to be played:

http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/55...5327D329D909F/
Illutian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2012, 05:24 AM   #7
sfade
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Reputation: 937
Posts: 2,124
Quote:
Originally Posted by Illutian View Post
Take away: Go with a 3GB (per GPU) or more card.
That's totally overkill for 1080. Not that having extra would hurt, but completely overkill.
sfade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2012, 03:49 PM   #8
rotNdude
 
rotNdude's Avatar
 
Volunteer Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Reputation: 9248
Posts: 45,563
What resolution do you run at now?
rotNdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2012, 04:38 PM   #9
dachshundfan
 
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Reputation: 476
Posts: 466
Quote:
Originally Posted by rotNdude View Post
What resolution do you run at now?
1920x1080. im just not sure if future games will use up that video memory. i could always get a second card somewhere down the line when prices drop
dachshundfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2012, 04:41 PM   #10
rotNdude
 
rotNdude's Avatar
 
Volunteer Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Reputation: 9248
Posts: 45,563
Quote:
Originally Posted by dachshundfan View Post
1920x1080. im just not sure if future games will use up that video memory. i could always get a second card somewhere down the line when prices drop
By the time video games need that amount of VRAM, you will have either updated your monitor to the next higher res or your video card will simply not keep up based on GPU power. I would go with the 2GB version.
rotNdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2012, 04:41 PM   #11
Zodiark1593
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Reputation: 362
Posts: 913
At 1920 x 1080, 4 GB likely won't be of much use until texture sizes jump dramatically, and you crank up AA to extreme levels.
Zodiark1593 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2012, 05:36 PM   #12
venomblade89
 
 
 
Join Date: May 2010
Reputation: 326
Posts: 1,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zodiark1593 View Post
At 1920 x 1080, 4 GB likely won't be of much use until texture sizes jump dramatically, and you crank up AA to extreme levels.
He'll still be fine with any game at any settings(VRAM-wise) with the 2gb @1080p
venomblade89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2012, 03:59 PM   #13
kmrking
 
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Reputation: 411
Posts: 2,635
if you plan on running multi monitor, or single monitor at 2560x1600 on future games, the 4gb might help
kmrking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2012, 04:17 PM   #14
venomblade89
 
 
 
Join Date: May 2010
Reputation: 326
Posts: 1,083
If you're using Eyefinity or Nvidia surround at crazy high res's, 4gb might be in your best interest. 2560x1600 should be fine with 2gb, but for how long I don't know. Any res under that is fine with 2gb.
venomblade89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2012, 08:59 PM   #15
Bad_Motha
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Reputation: 3133
Posts: 13,111
For single or dual screen setups, a single GTX 680 2GB is more then enough @ 1080p (or even 1920x1200)
Bad_Motha is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Go Back   Steam Users' Forums > Steam Discussions > Hardware and Operating Systems


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Site Content Copyright Valve Corporation 1998-2012, All Rights Reserved.