Home| What is Steam| Community| News| Cyber Cafés| Forums| Support| Stats

Go Back   Steam Users' Forums > Steam Game Discussions > H - L > Half-Life 2: Episode 2
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 46 votes, 4.52 average. Display Modes
Old 11-02-2009, 08:23 AM   #2191
Jinoru
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Reputation: 53
Posts: 1,195
I figured my wording was unique. guess not...
oh well. L4D2 demo's pretty sweet.
Jinoru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2009, 08:26 AM   #2192
mimaz98
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Reputation: 518
Posts: 17,054
Ah, that does indeed remind me. I must send into them my impressions of the demo.
mimaz98 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2009, 10:53 AM   #2193
surfrock22
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Reputation: 137
Posts: 3,293
I still think they've been making a new engine. I'll continue to think that, until proven otherwise.

Also, our goal here should not be to disprove theories. It should be to provide useful and insightful information, as Mimaz has provided. "I told you so" doesn't get anyone anywhere.
surfrock22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2009, 12:25 PM   #2194
supernaut
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Reputation: 769
Posts: 3,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by surfrock22 View Post
I still think they've been making a new engine. I'll continue to think that, until proven otherwise.
They are improving an engine, but even I understand, with my limited knowledge, that they can't keep updating it forever. Valve has different goals though, different from teams like id Software, Epic Games or Crytek. While they need to do an overhaul to Source at some point, in order to compete with the AAA titles of the future, they work at their own pace, keeping their eyes on our system specs, changes in the industry and will act according to those changes. And if Valve sees the need to rip the gaming world another by taking things to another level, like they did in 2004, then they will. What I like about them is that they don't play catch-up, they bring it, if that is necessary.

Quote:
Originally Posted by surfrock22 View Post
Also, our goal here should not be to disprove theories. It should be to provide useful and insightful information, as Mimaz has provided. "I told you so" doesn't get anyone anywhere.
You can quote me, don't be shy. My goal certainly wasn't to belittle you in some way, I just wanted to give you a smack of reality, so to speak. And how wasn't our debate useful and insightful ? Two completely different opinions, in search of truth, and everyone who witnessed it can draw their own conclusions and make their own theories about it. And this time it was concluded by an email reply, which Mimaz provided us, with the word "No". What is sad though, about coming to the Episode 2 forum, is looking at people discussing NOTHING! Impossible, nonexistent things, like Arkane Studios assisting Valve in developing Episode 3 or the desire to see iron sights in Episode 3 or that Half-Life 3 is already in development and so on and so on. In the end it's a complete and utter waste of time, no matter how useful and insightful it may seem. While there's no need to discuss something, just for the sake of having something to discuss, it's fine, cos it keeps the forums going. It's just that moments like these make me wonder why am I on the internet at all and typing this .

Don't take any of this to heart, cos it's just my opinion, only words among the millions of useless comments posted every single minute.
supernaut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2009, 03:24 PM   #2195
surfrock22
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Reputation: 137
Posts: 3,293
Quote:
Originally Posted by supernaut View Post
They are improving an engine, but even I understand, with my limited knowledge, that they can't keep updating it forever. Valve has different goals though, different from teams like id Software, Epic Games or Crytek. While they need to do an overhaul to Source at some point, in order to compete with the AAA titles of the future, they work at their own pace, keeping their eyes on our system specs, changes in the industry and will act according to those changes. And if Valve sees the need to rip the gaming world another by taking things to another level, like they did in 2004, then they will. What I like about them is that they don't play catch-up, they bring it, if that is necessary.



You can quote me, don't be shy. My goal certainly wasn't to belittle you in some way, I just wanted to give you a smack of reality, so to speak. And how wasn't our debate useful and insightful ? Two completely different opinions, in search of truth, and everyone who witnessed it can draw their own conclusions and make their own theories about it. And this time it was concluded by an email reply, which Mimaz provided us, with the word "No". What is sad though, about coming to the Episode 2 forum, is looking at people discussing NOTHING! Impossible, nonexistent things, like Arkane Studios assisting Valve in developing Episode 3 or the desire to see iron sights in Episode 3 or that Half-Life 3 is already in development and so on and so on. In the end it's a complete and utter waste of time, no matter how useful and insightful it may seem. While there's no need to discuss something, just for the sake of having something to discuss, it's fine, cos it keeps the forums going. It's just that moments like these make me wonder why am I on the internet at all and typing this .

Don't take any of this to heart, cos it's just my opinion, only words among the millions of useless comments posted every single minute.
I was not being shy, I thought it was quite obvious that there was no need to quote. There are a very limited number of users who frequent these forums.

Also: a smack of reality? Lol, as if you knew for a fact that HL3 was not being made. Give me a break man, you are just as much in the dark about all of this lack of information as I am, and your speculation is no more valid.

My only point is that nothing should be dismissed until otherwise proven. You don't have to like it, and I'm not trying to "debunk" any of your all-knowing-God-sent speculation. It's just counterproductive and pointless, to be quite honest, to tell others that their speculation is wrong or ridiculous when you have no idea if what you believe is true..

Back on topic, I wonder when the next engine will surface..
surfrock22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2009, 04:11 PM   #2196
supernaut
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Reputation: 769
Posts: 3,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by surfrock22 View Post
...as if you knew for a fact that HL3 was not being made. Give me a break man, you are just as much in the dark about all of this lack of information as I am, and your speculation is no more valid.
I was 99.9% sure that HL3 was not being made. I went by logic and facts, nothing less nothing more, and I don't need a reason for the lack of information to realize that no other HL title is in the works or being morphed into something bigger. I know I must sound incredibly cocky when I say that, but with the simple use of logic (200 people, number of games in development since HL2), it was never a possibility.

Quote:
Originally Posted by surfrock22 View Post
My only point is that nothing should be dismissed until otherwise proven.
In general, yes, but not in this case. For something to be proven to be true, it must first be proven to be plausible. If Valve had, lets say, 300-500 people on their development staff and the same amount of projects in the works, then it definitely becomes plausible, but then we'd have to ask if it makes sense. Like I said, it all comes down to manpower and what's physically possible. Game developers are not miracle workers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by surfrock22 View Post
You don't have to like it, and I'm not trying to "debunk" any of your all-knowing-God-sent speculation. It's just counterproductive and pointless, to be quite honest, to tell others that their speculation is wrong or ridiculous when you have no idea if what you believe is true..
My speculation is not godsend, it arrives by FedEx. But seriously, I love debating with you. There I said it. At least there's an intelligent person opposite of me, unlike when debating with our two renowned forum members who're engulfed by their egos. And I didn't flat out tell you that "you are wrong", you gotta give me more credit than that. Based on logic, facts and history, I have a pretty good idea what can and can not be true about Valve.
supernaut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2009, 09:24 PM   #2197
mimaz98
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Reputation: 518
Posts: 17,054
Quote:
Originally Posted by supernaut View Post
I was 99.9% sure that HL3 was not being made. I went by logic and facts, nothing less nothing more, and I don't need a reason for the lack of information to realize that no other HL title is in the works or being morphed into something bigger. I know I must sound incredibly cocky when I say that, but with the simple use of logic (200 people, number of games in development since HL2), it was never a possibility.
Sorry, Surfrock, but I must agree with this.
mimaz98 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 07:28 PM   #2198
surfrock22
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Reputation: 137
Posts: 3,293
Quote:
Originally Posted by supernaut View Post
I was 99.9% sure that HL3 was not being made. I went by logic and facts, nothing less nothing more, and I don't need a reason for the lack of information to realize that no other HL title is in the works or being morphed into something bigger. I know I must sound incredibly cocky when I say that, but with the simple use of logic (200 people, number of games in development since HL2), it was never a possibility.



In general, yes, but not in this case. For something to be proven to be true, it must first be proven to be plausible. If Valve had, lets say, 300-500 people on their development staff and the same amount of projects in the works, then it definitely becomes plausible, but then we'd have to ask if it makes sense. Like I said, it all comes down to manpower and what's physically possible. Game developers are not miracle workers.



My speculation is not godsend, it arrives by FedEx. But seriously, I love debating with you. There I said it. At least there's an intelligent person opposite of me, unlike when debating with our two renowned forum members who're engulfed by their egos. And I didn't flat out tell you that "you are wrong", you gotta give me more credit than that. Based on logic, facts and history, I have a pretty good idea what can and can not be true about Valve.
I appreciate this, thanks.

99.99%? And what number is this based off of?

And, no, you were not telling me flat out that I was wrong.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mimaz98 View Post
Sorry, Surfrock, but I must agree with this.
Let's be honest. You only agree with it because he used the word cocky and was blistering with arrogance.

Last edited by surfrock22 : 11-03-2009 at 07:33 PM.
surfrock22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 07:38 PM   #2199
mimaz98
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Reputation: 518
Posts: 17,054
No, I'm agreeing with it because I agree with it.
mimaz98 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 07:46 PM   #2200
supernaut
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Reputation: 769
Posts: 3,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by surfrock22 View Post
I appreciate this, thanks.
You're welcome.

Quote:
Originally Posted by surfrock22 View Post
99.99%? And what number is this based off of?
Just a random figure to represent that I wasn't completely sure.

Quote:
Originally Posted by surfrock22 View Post
And, no, you were not telling me flat out that I was wrong.
I appreciate that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by surfrock22 View Post
Let's be honest. You only agree with it because he used the word cocky and was blistering with arrogance.
Haha, well I try to be as honest as I can.
supernaut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 09:31 PM   #2201
surfrock22
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Reputation: 137
Posts: 3,293
Quote:
Originally Posted by mimaz98 View Post
No, I'm agreeing with it because I agree with it.
It was just a joke, bud. I'm sure you agree with it.

Back on topic, I'm sure Valve has at least been planning, for some time (years), what is to come post-Source..

Last edited by surfrock22 : 11-03-2009 at 09:35 PM.
surfrock22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 10:14 PM   #2202
mimaz98
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Reputation: 518
Posts: 17,054
They've certainly got their eyes on Larrabee.
mimaz98 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 10:30 PM   #2203
Barney
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Reputation: 4
Posts: 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by mimaz98 View Post
They've certainly got their eyes on Larrabee.
Yes, I do hope Mr. Newell et al will usher in a new era of gaming using Larrabee.

Can you imagine Half-Life 3 or whatever running on a Larrabee? *creams pants*
Barney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2009, 05:46 AM   #2204
supernaut
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Reputation: 769
Posts: 3,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by mimaz98 View Post
They've certainly got their eyes on Larrabee.
Where was this said ?
supernaut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2009, 07:17 AM   #2205
Kohvi
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Reputation: 0
Posts: 182
Quote:
Originally Posted by supernaut View Post
Where was this said ?
http://forums.steampowered.com/forum...light=larrabee
So Larrabee or something like that.
Kohvi is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Episode 3 Half Life 3 Portal 2 daventry Half-Life 2: Episode 2 7 10-11-2008 12:30 PM
HALF LIFE 2 EPISODE PACK INSTALL PROBLEM!!! Posivy Help and Tips 5 10-10-2008 04:09 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Site Content Copyright Valve Corporation 1998-2009, All Rights Reserved.