This game makes Civ V look like an embarrassment

[amirfoox]

Originally Posted by Shismar

The diplomacy of the Civ series is not that much different from the games you mentioned. And even if you like them better, they are far from complex or challenging.

What does 'challenging' has anything to do with a game's diplomacy?

But SMAC's or Galciv 2's diplomacy models are not complex? Strategy and tech awareness, battle coordinations, requests/bribes for votes, remembering your past actions against allies, or atrocities you have done against enemies, understanding your threat by looking at your combined strength with your allies, or attempting to subvert and divide you from them with bribes and dessent? Yeah, not intricate at all. As good as Civ's 'you have a different religion -2' little messages, eh? Just because you disagree with my opinion about Civ doesn't mean you have to say stuff that's just false. These are known as amongst the best in the mainstream 4X genre, and rightfully so. Only niche games might be considered better, and they're mostly just needlessly complicate matters than they should.

[Chixdiggit]

Originally Posted by dachshundfan

the only thing this game needs is multiplayer, and once that comes out, this game will easily be better than civ 5

So multiplayer is coming later? How do you know?

[s1234567890m]

Originally Posted by Chixdiggit

So multiplayer is coming later? How do you know?

The CEO of paradox said so during a livestream

[Cereal_Killa]

I hope that minimap isn't final