|
|
#1 |
|
Volunteer Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Reputation: 9193
Posts: 45,480
|
New drives for our computers
The hard drive in our secondary computer appears to have failed. SeaTools diagnostics revealed that important sectors on the drive failed the test because they are difficult to read. No big deal, since there is nothing important on this computer and a reformat/reinstall wouldn't hurt anyhow, but I'm going to assume the drive is dead from a magnetic media perspective.
I will definitely do some more testing of it. The symptoms are:
What SSD would you buy today assuming something around 128GB? I would be buying one for the secondary computer and one for the primary computer. The price isn't that important to me, so I am looking for reliability and performance. The secondary and primary computers are both a couple of generations old. Here are the motherboard make and model for each of them. Primary computer - ASUS P5W DH Deluxe Secondary computer - ASUS P5B Deluxe They both run 3Gb/s SATA ports. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2011
Reputation: 415
Posts: 2,465
|
Corsair Force 3. 60Gb/90Gb/120Gb. Whatever suites you. They're fairly cheap and the specs are 550MB/s read and 490MB/s write, so if you ever get a motherboard with 6Gb/s you'll see a nice speed boost.
That's assuming you mean SATA2 (3Gb/s) and not SATA3 (6Gb/s). It gets confusing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Reputation: 277
Posts: 955
|
Just be advised that with XP, you won't have native TRIM support, although it looks like Intel's drives can do it with their toolbox (although I haven't researched this extensively). Also, you'll have to align the partition(s) manually, and look into how to install AHCI drivers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Volunteer Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Reputation: 9193
Posts: 45,480
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2009
Reputation: 277
Posts: 955
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2010
Reputation: 683
Posts: 7,234
|
A lot of things to consider.
1) Customer support 2) Quality of the drives 3) Cost to performance ratio 4) Average MTBF rating 5) Actual performance alone. Depends if writes or reads are important. 6) Power consumption (could be an issue) 7) Known problems in different communities who have that particular drive. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Reputation: 2290
Posts: 9,108
|
Quote:
I would only consider a Sandforce based drive if you're expecting to put compressible data on it, and have a backup. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Volunteer Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Reputation: 9193
Posts: 45,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Reputation: 2290
Posts: 9,108
|
Quote:
The Crucial m4 has a three year warranty, but better performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2010
Reputation: 819
Posts: 1,697
|
Quote:
![]() It might be worth checking out the 520 SSD's by Intel as they have SATA 3 support which could be useful if you carry it over to a future build. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|