is this game fun?

Kevin2Gamer · 11-18-2009, 04:50 PM

does it have multiplayer?

11-19-2009, 06:03 AM

No it doesnt have multi-player but the singleplayer is well worth the money.

tviceman · 11-20-2009, 06:30 AM

The single player campaign will take 8-12 hours, depending on how fast your play style is. It took me about 9 hours. It's a really unique experience from other FPS games because of the time travel elements and getting to use modern weapons in the past. The game is a little rough around the edges (you can tell the budget was very limited) but the fun factor is definitely there and I highly recommend grabbing it if you think the demo is fun.

Cogito · 02-01-2010, 01:54 PM

I recommend reading the reviews and heeding the metascore of... 51!

Also, there is a demo: http://news.bigdownload.com/2009/08/...-of-days-demo/

Edit: I just noticed the demo is on Steam, too.

Ahnteis · 03-17-2010, 03:16 PM

It's fun, but it is a low budget game. So it's not perfect, but it has an entertaining story and isn't super-buggy.

LTCHIPS · 04-19-2010, 05:49 PM

If I remember so, the demo was okay. I think I'll be getting this game during a sale.

Rhylin · 04-19-2010, 07:18 PM

I remember the demo being uninstalled from my system within 15 minutes... just my honesty

millionmice · 06-07-2010, 01:17 AM

I bought it and didn't have regrets. The demo impressed me in that it loaded in about 3 seconds which was faster than any other game i've seen :O

swish007 · 03-19-2011, 06:17 PM

I liked it a lot actually. it *is* kinda rough around the edges but it's a good little fps that does something pretty different. for me the most important thing in an fps is how it "feels" controls/perception-wise. this nails it imo. sure the graphics aren't too great but they didn't look cartoony or anything to me so it didn't distract from the gameplay. There was some cool physx stuff going on too that I really liked.

you can tell they put a lot of care into the game; the historical accuracy (with some artistic license obviously) was really satisfying to me, and I found myself looking up the actual histories of the battles afterwards.

I'd be thrilled to see a sequel.. this really didn't get the recognition it deserved I think.

11-18-2009, 04:50 PM	#1
Kevin2Gamer Banned Join Date: Nov 2009 Reputation: 1 Posts: 6	is this game fun? does it have multiplayer?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

11-19-2009, 06:03 AM	#2
ramklov Guest Posts: n/a	No it doesnt have multi-player but the singleplayer is well worth the money.

11-20-2009, 06:30 AM	#3
tviceman Join Date: Sep 2008 Reputation: 152 Posts: 383	The single player campaign will take 8-12 hours, depending on how fast your play style is. It took me about 9 hours. It's a really unique experience from other FPS games because of the time travel elements and getting to use modern weapons in the past. The game is a little rough around the edges (you can tell the budget was very limited) but the fun factor is definitely there and I highly recommend grabbing it if you think the demo is fun.

02-01-2010, 01:54 PM	#4
Cogito Join Date: Jun 2009 Reputation: 6 Posts: 236	I recommend reading the reviews and heeding the metascore of... 51! Also, there is a demo: http://news.bigdownload.com/2009/08/...-of-days-demo/ Edit: I just noticed the demo is on Steam, too.

03-17-2010, 03:16 PM	#5
Ahnteis Join Date: Oct 2003 Reputation: 13 Posts: 772	It's fun, but it is a low budget game. So it's not perfect, but it has an entertaining story and isn't super-buggy.

04-19-2010, 05:49 PM	#6
LTCHIPS Banned Join Date: Nov 2009 Reputation: 1 Posts: 397	If I remember so, the demo was okay. I think I'll be getting this game during a sale.

04-19-2010, 07:18 PM	#7
Rhylin Join Date: Mar 2010 Reputation: 4 Posts: 246	I remember the demo being uninstalled from my system within 15 minutes... just my honesty

06-07-2010, 01:17 AM	#8
millionmice Join Date: Sep 2008 Reputation: 54 Posts: 984	I bought it and didn't have regrets. The demo impressed me in that it loaded in about 3 seconds which was faster than any other game i've seen :O

03-19-2011, 06:17 PM	#9
swish007 Join Date: Oct 2008 Reputation: 0 Posts: 57	I liked it a lot actually. it is kinda rough around the edges but it's a good little fps that does something pretty different. for me the most important thing in an fps is how it "feels" controls/perception-wise. this nails it imo. sure the graphics aren't too great but they didn't look cartoony or anything to me so it didn't distract from the gameplay. There was some cool physx stuff going on too that I really liked. you can tell they put a lot of care into the game; the historical accuracy (with some artistic license obviously) was really satisfying to me, and I found myself looking up the actual histories of the battles afterwards. I'd be thrilled to see a sequel.. this really didn't get the recognition it deserved I think.