Campaing scoring?

vaillant085 · 03-14-2011, 01:28 PM

For those who like to play campaigns, could a scoring system be put in place? like bronze, silver, gold standard?
Scoring based on:
1 shoot accuracy
2 damage taken
3 completion time
What do you think? The scoring system would be meant for cooperative play, the total sum of effort of the survivors together.

curran12 · 03-14-2011, 01:30 PM

One question:

Why?

john_volkov · 03-14-2011, 01:34 PM

because it's coop and it sould be fun , even competitive.

Zeratulz · 03-14-2011, 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by john_volkov

because it's coop and it sould be fun , even competitive.

Everyone's already battling for the least incaps, no deaths, least FF, Most keelz.. Competitive enough.

"LOL I KILLED MORE HUNTERS THAN YOU"
Yeh men, u pro.

No_wander_off · 03-14-2011, 01:55 PM

Co-op it's not a competition, and many people like it that way.

Including a score when it's really not nedeed at all would be against the design of co-op.

john_volkov · 03-14-2011, 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by No_wander_off

Co-op it's not a competition, and many people like it that way.

Including a score when it's really not nedeed at all would be against the design of co-op.

Competitive not like versus , but more like who get's more kills , preaty much who is the mpv of the game,sometimes I join a server with 3 noobs trying to get the expert achivment , and when I tell them they have nothing to do with expert they start flaming me,because they fail (preaty much happens with evry russian and cz i'v meet)This way people may see who is the MVP, me and my friend when we play L4D2 co op I make fun of him when I got 1 more zombie kill then he dose.

MyClam-- · 03-14-2011, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by john_volkov

Competitive not like versus , but more like who get's more kills , preaty much who is the mpv of the game,sometimes I join a server with 3 noobs trying to get the expert achivment , and when I tell them they have nothing to do with expert they start flaming me,because they fail (preaty much happens with evry russian and cz i'v meet)This way people may see who is the MVP, me and my friend when we play L4D2 co op I make fun of him when I got 1 more zombie kill then he dose.

i think you're playing with the wrong kind of people if you need to claim bragging rights in the end of a coop game...

curran12 · 03-14-2011, 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by john_volkov

Competitive not like versus , but more like who get's more kills , preaty much who is the mpv of the game,sometimes I join a server with 3 noobs trying to get the expert achivment , and when I tell them they have nothing to do with expert they start flaming me,because they fail (preaty much happens with evry russian and cz i'v meet)This way people may see who is the MVP, me and my friend when we play L4D2 co op I make fun of him when I got 1 more zombie kill then he dose.

And I think the argument against "competitive co-op" has been made for us, thank you.

Bindal · 03-14-2011, 02:05 PM

Coop already says what's to do in that mode: Cooperate. Means working TOGETHER, not AGAINST each other. Competitive however is working AGAINST someone. So, the total opposite of cooperating.

Beside, we already got the credits, which tells you, who did what. That's already enough.

vaillant085 · 03-14-2011, 02:15 PM

I meant a cooperative score, where everyone is taken into account, not competitive

Cymen90 · 03-14-2011, 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by john_volkov

because it's coop and it sould be fun , even competitive.

My contradiction meter is going crazy here.

No_wander_off · 03-14-2011, 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vaillant085

I meant a cooperative score, where everyone is taken into account, not competitive

Oh, you the ending credits at the end of each campaign.

infrequent · 03-14-2011, 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by john_volkov

because it's coop and it sould be fun , even competitive.

That it's coop defeats your argument. Coop is about team performance, not your performance.

But I would not mind having a kill-counter and a headshot-counter so I could see if do my job right

Icy_Inferno · 03-14-2011, 02:21 PM

I could see this as a way for people to practice clearing CI while avoiding friendly fire/CI damage, and progressing quickly. I like. I think I'd like it better for L4D1 though, since the common in that game seem a bit more menacing to me in terms of pathing and lack of melee weapons.

zupalex · 03-14-2011, 02:24 PM

In fact a score for the whole team according to the global performances of everyone, and not a score per player seems a good idea to me. You know, like survival, the medal is for everyone in the team, not just the best player.

03-14-2011, 01:28 PM	#1
vaillant085 Join Date: Feb 2011 Reputation: 16 Posts: 81	Campaing scoring? For those who like to play campaigns, could a scoring system be put in place? like bronze, silver, gold standard? Scoring based on: 1 shoot accuracy 2 damage taken 3 completion time What do you think? The scoring system would be meant for cooperative play, the total sum of effort of the survivors together. Last edited by vaillant085: 03-14-2011 at 02:27 PM.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

03-14-2011, 01:30 PM	#2
curran12 Join Date: Oct 2010 Reputation: 336 Posts: 766	One question: Why?

03-14-2011, 01:34 PM	#3
john_volkov Join Date: Jun 2009 Reputation: 159 Posts: 3,562	because it's coop and it sould be fun , even competitive.

03-14-2011, 01:55 PM	#5
No_wander_off Join Date: Jan 2010 Reputation: 1442 Posts: 10,633	Co-op it's not a competition, and many people like it that way. Including a score when it's really not nedeed at all would be against the design of co-op.

03-14-2011, 02:05 PM	#9
Bindal Banned Join Date: Sep 2009 Reputation: 685 Posts: 7,545	Coop already says what's to do in that mode: Cooperate. Means working TOGETHER, not AGAINST each other. Competitive however is working AGAINST someone. So, the total opposite of cooperating. Beside, we already got the credits, which tells you, who did what. That's already enough.

03-14-2011, 02:15 PM	#10
vaillant085 Join Date: Feb 2011 Reputation: 16 Posts: 81	I meant a cooperative score, where everyone is taken into account, not competitive

03-14-2011, 02:21 PM	#14
Icy_Inferno Join Date: Oct 2009 Reputation: 34 Posts: 131	I could see this as a way for people to practice clearing CI while avoiding friendly fire/CI damage, and progressing quickly. I like. I think I'd like it better for L4D1 though, since the common in that game seem a bit more menacing to me in terms of pathing and lack of melee weapons.

03-14-2011, 02:24 PM	#15
zupalex Join Date: Dec 2008 Reputation: 28 Posts: 247	In fact a score for the whole team according to the global performances of everyone, and not a score per player seems a good idea to me. You know, like survival, the medal is for everyone in the team, not just the best player.