If u post up... system specs plz

[mikeog]

Every time I read a moaning, whining post from someone about how bad this game runs on their PC blah blah blah I find it annoying that posters don't put up their system specs.

PLEASE post up your system specs in any post so that people can compare problems more easily. No PC is the same.

Personally, I run this game on medium with AA etc off and it runs fine apart from the odd crash. I'm sure TW will crack it. Have patience, it's a great game.

Win 7 (6.8 exp)
Intel Quad 6850 @ 3ghz
Gigabyte GA EP43 UD3L motherboard
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
4 gig DDR2 800 RAM
60 gig SSD
250 gig HD

[Elensar]

Personally I would expect alot better than Medium settings out of the machine spec you posted. And that is exactly why people are unhappy with the game. BUT if you are happy then well... Thats great, personally I would be very annoyed at poor settings and any crashes at all for the machine listed.

[Haydar]

You play medium with advanced options off on a 460 and you say you have no problem. Weird.

[Bossebrutal]

I run this game on Ultra with everything enabled except AA, V-Sync and some other random stuff like framerate smoothing. This game runs good enough for me with around 40-70 fps.

Win 7 Pro
i5 2500K @ stock 3,3ghz
Asus P8P67 PRO REV B3 mobo
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 580 1536MB OC
8gb Corsair 1600mhz RAM
120gb SSD
1TB HDD

The only problems I've had is that the sound sometimes crashes. I've done some tweaks and it got better, actually only crashed once after that. I'm reeeaally looking forward to when TWI is done with the patching. Be patient!

[irnbru]

Asus G73JH-TZ008V Laptop
Display: 17" Full HD TFT (1920x1080, Color-Shine)
CPU: Intel® Core™ i7-720QM processor 1.60 GHz with Turbo Boost up to 2.8 GHz
Graphics: ATI Mobility™ Radeon® HD 5870, 1GB GDDR5 dedicated graphics memory
Storage: 1TB (500GBx2) (7200rpm)
Memory: 8912MB (2048x4) DDRIII 1066 RAM
OS: 64bit Windows 7 Home Premium

The game runs smoothly for me on medium/high.

[Woffles420]

i just bought the game then, and currently downloading it. Would i get max graphics with this

windows 7 64-bit
i7 950 @ 3.8Ghz
Asus rampage III extreme mobo
x2 Radion HD6870 in crossfire
6GB Kingston hyperX 1600mhz RAM
1TB WD C-black

probs a stupid question really....

[mikeog]

^^^Woffles...

Your crossfire might be a problem. Check the forums here and on TW to see a solution/fix

I get about 50-70 fps.

My point is that I can play the game with acceptable graphics/sound and it's perfectly playable. I know it's below my system spec but I don't see the point in getting mad angry at TW when the game itself is playable. I'm not the sort of gamer that needs mega sxxt hot graphics running on an overclocked monster machine. I can shoot you and enjoy it just as well now as when the game is fixed and I can push the settings more. It's not stopping me playing.

Remember, TW aren't a massive developer with endless resources and manpower. I can accept they bit off more than they can chew but they are fixing it. It's way better than CoD or Battlefield even at half spec.

It's the gaming that counts.

[Woffles420]

Originally Posted by mikeog

^^^Woffles...

Your crossfire might be a problem. Check the forums here and on TW to see a solution/fix

ahhh ok thanks

win7 home
phenom x4 955 3,2ghz
4gb ddr3
hd 5770

I run this game on ultra with maybe 22-35 fps. I know that sounds weird, but medium settings only increase my fps by 10-15, so I chose to make it look good.

The game schould perform propably better and I hope they fix it. It looks good, but it's far from being a BF3 in terms of graphic. The BF3 Alpha looked better and was easily playable with non high-end machines. Medium settings should be for people with an two year old pc. Low settings are obsolete, believe me. I tried it and it looks worse than RO1, which you rather stick to then.

Cryostatis (some may heard of it) had similar problems. A so-so appearance but hardware-demanding like crysis or worse. The difference is, that RO2 isn't quite an indy title like Cryostatis. Thus I'm confident that they will fix it.

Otherwise RO2 is gone in no time. Nobody with rigs like the OT wants to play a game with U3 engine at 30-40 fps. Period.

[Deluxxe]

Originally Posted by Bossebrutal

I run this game on Ultra with everything enabled except AA, V-Sync and some other random stuff like framerate smoothing. This game runs good enough for me with around 40-70 fps.

I can't imagine running this game without v-sync. Any FPS for me, v-sync is a must. Otherwise the screen tearing just makes it seem choppy/jittery even at high framerates. I'd rather have a low framerate with v-sync on, than a high framerate with v-sync off personally.

i get pretty decent framerates on my setup. between 40 and 60. Does not run as well as it should IMO though. The graphics engine looks dated so i'm not really sure what could be putting such strain on the framerate

detail - ultra
textures - ultra
shadows - medium
everything else high
ambient occlusion - off
framerate smoothing - off (have no idea what this does though)

win7
Radeon 5850
i5-750 @ 3.4Ghz
Gigabyte UD3-R
8GB Ram

[mudflaps]

i5 2500k 4.5 ghz asus p8
6 gig ram
6870 crossfire 11.8 cap 3
1 tb hdd raid 0
win 7 64
30-60fps
game runs like ♥♥♥♥. with 1 or 2 cards. this game runs bad the same way arma runs bad. Arma at least looked nice on ultra. this game looks like ♥♥♥♥.

game breakin ♥♥♥♥. I think i would rather look at cod 1

[Destructor-2011]

I play all in Ultra at 1600x900(monitor) and 1920x1080(HD T.V) at more of 40 and 50 FPS normally.

PC:

OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bits
CPU: Intel Core i5 750 2.67GHz (With Turbo Boost at 3.2GHz as normal)
Memory: 8GB RAM at 1333MHz
GPU: Evga GTX 570 (First Edition)

[R5CYA]

Originally Posted by mikeog

Every time I read a moaning, whining post from someone about how bad this game runs on their PC blah blah blah I find it annoying that posters don't put up their system specs.

PLEASE post up your system specs in any post so that people can compare problems more easily. No PC is the same.

Personally, I run this game on medium with AA etc off and it runs fine apart from the odd crash. I'm sure TW will crack it. Have patience, it's a great game.

Win 7 (6.8 exp)
Intel Quad 6850 @ 3ghz
Gigabyte GA EP43 UD3L motherboard
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
4 gig DDR2 800 RAM
60 gig SSD
250 gig HD

sorry. this would make too much sense and we just might accidently see a trend, in confusers that work and those that don't. proposterous!

[JTWibble]

I play in High 1680x1050 with AA set to low. The game ran perfectly in medium so I bumped it up to high and had no problems.

Win 7 64bit
Intel Quad Q9400
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250
4GB RAM
1.6TB HD

[fuzzy4peaches]

I run the game in 1024X768, on roughly medium/high settings, with 4x AA (configured through CCC), I put that AA level on because it is so choppy at that resolution you can hardly pick out distant objects. I average about 27fps, occasionally above 30 now that they have improved the performance a bit. But I am still hopeful that it will get better.

HP DV6-3023CA Laptop:
- AMD Turion x2 Dual Core 2.3ghz
- Ati Radeon Mobility HD5650 1GB
- 4GB DDR3 RAM
- 500GB 5400RPM HDD
- 15.6" 1280*720p Native display
- Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit