Benchmarking: How To & Post Your Scores - Page 10

01-17-2005, 02:12 PM

Got the 3dMark03 results? BTW ur card is awesome... I only paid 1125$ US for my rig and it has pretty light :P(lol useless I know).. 130000 yen is about 1125 US

CC

01-17-2005, 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Crazy^Crisp
What you running??

I want proof

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3576716

01-17-2005, 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by hAiduZ
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3576716

Let me guess PCI-X ???

Where did you get the drivers for your card?

What type of AMD is that?

T Rush · 01-17-2005, 11:57 PM

Crazy^Crisp and hAiduZ...
some things you two should think about as you compare scores...

Crazy^Crisp paid to have the computer built (and got a warranty)

hAiduZ has a lesser CPU overclocked (@2.0GHz), save'n money and running the RAM much faster (225MHz is PC 3600 speeds) giving higher scores

Crazy^Crisp is running at stock speeds, if the Winchester was overclocked the CPU scores would go way past hAiduZ's 2 point lead (at 225MHz that CPU would hit 2.4GHz and still could go higher)

hAiduZ is running the 6600GT at higher core and mem MHz's and use'n higher version drivers, that can give the 800 point lead easy.

Crazy^Crisp paid $200 more for a stronger computer

hAiduZ did more with less

BattousaiHimura is use'n an Intel, but got $500 video card to make up for it

( get drivers here http://downloads.guru3d.com/ )

T Rush · 01-18-2005, 02:04 AM

could someone try HOC for me (as I wont be home and on my computer for 2 more weeks)

you need to have HL2 installed

"This is a new program that allows you to benchmark your system with today’s most popular FPS-game, Half-Life 2. The program does not modify any registry-entries or configuration files, so it is completely safe to use. It contains 5 built in demos; you can set filtering methods, resolutions and much much more.

You'll notice a few Guru3D.com timedemo's inside this software!"

http://downloads.guru3d.com/download.php?det=927

Warhorse · 01-18-2005, 09:29 AM

Heres my scores.
---
3DMark03 - 12.977
-
AquaMark - 63.475
-
Doom 3 timedemo with High detail (1280x1024, 4xAA and 16xAF) 72.1fps
-
Half Life 2 stress test maxed out with reflect all (1024x768, 4xAA and 16xAF) 128.94fps
---
HOC test scores.
Global image quality via drivers = High Quality.
AA/AF = Application controlled.
Vsync = Off.
--
Resolution: 1280×1024
Demo: HardwareOC - d3c171
Detail: Maximum quality (& Reflect all)
Antialising mode: 4×
Filtering mode: Anisotropic 16×
Hardware DirectX level: DirectX 9
Heapsize: 256mb
Score = 52.4 FPS

Resolution: 1280×1024
Demo: HardwareOC - Coast
Detail: Maximum quality (& Reflect all)
Antialising mode: 4×
Filtering mode: Anisotropic 16×
Hardware DirectX level: DirectX 9
Heapsize: 256mb
Score = 63.9 FPS

Resolution: 1280×1024
Demo: Guru3D - demo4
Detail: Maximum quality (& Reflect all)
Antialising mode: 4×
Filtering mode: Anisotropic 16×
Hardware DirectX level: DirectX 9
Heapsize: 256mb
Score = 117.0 FPS

Resolution: 1280×1024
Demo: Guru3D - demo5
Detail: Maximum quality (& Reflect all)
Antialising mode: 4×
Filtering mode: Anisotropic 16×
Hardware DirectX level: DirectX 9
Heapsize: 256mb
Score = 95.2 FPS

Resolution: 1280×1024
Demo: Guru3D - demo6
Detail: Maximum quality (& Reflect all)
Antialising mode: 4×
Filtering mode: Anisotropic 16×
Hardware DirectX level: DirectX 9
Heapsize: 256mb
Score = 98.5 FPS
---
My Rig,
2.4b P4 @ 3.230ghz,
1 gig ddr400 ram,
6800GT @ 410/1200,
Drivers 65.73's.

Rohirrim · 01-18-2005, 09:46 AM

my new results with an gigabyte gf6600gt@500/1000
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=478347 << just the 3dmark05 result
i think ist ok , not the best but ok

01-18-2005, 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by j.rhy@n
Update...

AMD 64 3500+ Newcastle Socket 939 (Freezer 64 Cooler)
Connect 3D x800 XT PE (Artic Cooler 4)
1 Gig DDR 400
Asus A8V Delux K800 Via Chip
Creative Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS 7.1
Be Quiet BQT P5-420-s1.3 PSU
Latest Drivers from www.ati.com

3DMark05 6455 Points

3DMark01 24859 Points

3DMark03 13589 Points

I can go a lot more, but need to run the system in a little.

I'm in third place now for 3dmark 05

(of the submitted results)

01-18-2005, 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by T Rush
Crazy^Crisp and hAiduZ...
some things you two should think about as you compare scores...

Crazy^Crisp paid to have the computer built (and got a warranty)

hAiduZ has a lesser CPU overclocked (@2.0GHz), save'n money and running the RAM much faster (225MHz is PC 3600 speeds) giving higher scores

Crazy^Crisp is running at stock speeds, if the Winchester was overclocked the CPU scores would go way past hAiduZ's 2 point lead (at 225MHz that CPU would hit 2.4GHz and still could go higher)

hAiduZ is running the 6600GT at higher core and mem MHz's and use'n higher version drivers, that can give the 800 point lead easy.

Crazy^Crisp paid $200 more for a stronger computer

hAiduZ did more with less

BattousaiHimura is use'n an Intel, but got $500 video card to make up for it

( get drivers here http://downloads.guru3d.com/ )

???!

just joking m8, everyone has their preferences... but i think, if i trade in my 6800 ultra OC for a x800XT PE, i think it would work pretty nicely! (ati works better with direct3d, and most games use that.)

01-18-2005, 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Crazy^Crisp
Got the 3dMark03 results? BTW ur card is awesome... I only paid 1125$ US for my rig and it has pretty light :P(lol useless I know).. 130000 yen is about 1125 US

CC

not yet, but ill get em soon... maybe when finals are over.

01-18-2005, 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Crazy^Crisp
Let me guess PCI-X ???

Where did you get the drivers for your card?

What type of AMD is that?

No, AGP. PCI-X and AGP are practically the same.

http://downloads.guru3d.com/download.php?det=941
They got even newer ones now, like 5 different 70s drivers, im not testing them all tho hehe.

AMD 64 3000+ Winchster Core socket 939 with a Venus 12, soon to be XP-90 cos my Venus is failing...

8766 3Dmark03 with the official drivers. And stock CPU speeds.
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3600604

01-20-2005, 09:52 PM

Just updated my scores..

3DMark01 26287 Points

3DMark03 13857 Points

3DMark05 6599 Points

________________________

My Personnel Web Site Profile

01-21-2005, 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by j.rhy@n
Just updated my scores..

3DMark01 26287 Points

3DMark03 13857 Points

3DMark05 6599 Points

________________________

My Personnel Web Site Profile

If your '01 was also run at 610/613 then you've got a problem somewhere...mine completely stock (cpu ad gpu) outscores that.

01-21-2005, 05:34 PM

This is the best I can do with an out dates vid card (4 pixel pipes).

P4 2.4
Aopen Mb AXS4SPE-UN
533mHz fsb
Corsair XMS PC-3200 (2x512)
WD 80 Gig S-ATA 7200 rpm
FX 5700 Ultra OC'd to 522mHz/1.04gHz

3dmark03 score of 4203 is pretty lame but the best I can do until my 6800GT arrives...lol

3dmark03:
http://service.futuremark.com/servle...jectId=3614670

01-22-2005, 02:49 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ATW
If your '01 was also run at 610/613 then you've got a problem somewhere...mine completely stock (cpu ad gpu) outscores that.

Not really... 01 isnt as much GPU related as 05 etc etc CPU will bump your 01 scores up.

Ive not changed any Voltages etc etc The CPU is clocked in % ...

05 and 03 are the important ones...

Post your Results..

Thx

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

01-17-2005, 02:12 PM	#136
Crazy^Crisp Guest Posts: n/a	Got the 3dMark03 results? BTW ur card is awesome... I only paid 1125$ US for my rig and it has pretty light :P(lol useless I know).. 130000 yen is about 1125 US CC

01-17-2005, 11:57 PM	#139
T Rush Join Date: Dec 2004 Reputation: 2739 Posts: 20,000	Crazy^Crisp and hAiduZ... some things you two should think about as you compare scores... Crazy^Crisp paid to have the computer built (and got a warranty) hAiduZ has a lesser CPU overclocked (@2.0GHz), save'n money and running the RAM much faster (225MHz is PC 3600 speeds) giving higher scores Crazy^Crisp is running at stock speeds, if the Winchester was overclocked the CPU scores would go way past hAiduZ's 2 point lead (at 225MHz that CPU would hit 2.4GHz and still could go higher) hAiduZ is running the 6600GT at higher core and mem MHz's and use'n higher version drivers, that can give the 800 point lead easy. Crazy^Crisp paid $200 more for a stronger computer hAiduZ did more with less BattousaiHimura is use'n an Intel, but got $500 video card to make up for it ( get drivers here http://downloads.guru3d.com/ )

01-18-2005, 02:04 AM	#140
T Rush Join Date: Dec 2004 Reputation: 2739 Posts: 20,000	could someone try HOC for me (as I wont be home and on my computer for 2 more weeks) you need to have HL2 installed "This is a new program that allows you to benchmark your system with today’s most popular FPS-game, Half-Life 2. The program does not modify any registry-entries or configuration files, so it is completely safe to use. It contains 5 built in demos; you can set filtering methods, resolutions and much much more. You'll notice a few Guru3D.com timedemo's inside this software!" http://downloads.guru3d.com/download.php?det=927

01-18-2005, 09:29 AM	#141
Warhorse Join Date: Aug 2004 Reputation: 540 Posts: 2,341	Heres my scores. --- 3DMark03 - 12.977 - AquaMark - 63.475 - Doom 3 timedemo with High detail (1280x1024, 4xAA and 16xAF) 72.1fps - Half Life 2 stress test maxed out with reflect all (1024x768, 4xAA and 16xAF) 128.94fps --- HOC test scores. Global image quality via drivers = High Quality. AA/AF = Application controlled. Vsync = Off. -- Resolution: 1280×1024 Demo: HardwareOC - d3c171 Detail: Maximum quality (& Reflect all) Antialising mode: 4× Filtering mode: Anisotropic 16× Hardware DirectX level: DirectX 9 Heapsize: 256mb Score = 52.4 FPS Resolution: 1280×1024 Demo: HardwareOC - Coast Detail: Maximum quality (& Reflect all) Antialising mode: 4× Filtering mode: Anisotropic 16× Hardware DirectX level: DirectX 9 Heapsize: 256mb Score = 63.9 FPS Resolution: 1280×1024 Demo: Guru3D - demo4 Detail: Maximum quality (& Reflect all) Antialising mode: 4× Filtering mode: Anisotropic 16× Hardware DirectX level: DirectX 9 Heapsize: 256mb Score = 117.0 FPS Resolution: 1280×1024 Demo: Guru3D - demo5 Detail: Maximum quality (& Reflect all) Antialising mode: 4× Filtering mode: Anisotropic 16× Hardware DirectX level: DirectX 9 Heapsize: 256mb Score = 95.2 FPS Resolution: 1280×1024 Demo: Guru3D - demo6 Detail: Maximum quality (& Reflect all) Antialising mode: 4× Filtering mode: Anisotropic 16× Hardware DirectX level: DirectX 9 Heapsize: 256mb Score = 98.5 FPS --- My Rig, 2.4b P4 @ 3.230ghz, 1 gig ddr400 ram, 6800GT @ 410/1200, Drivers 65.73's.

01-18-2005, 09:46 AM	#142
Rohirrim Join Date: Nov 2004 Reputation: 0 Posts: 39	my new results with an gigabyte gf6600gt@500/1000 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=478347 << just the 3dmark05 result i think ist ok , not the best but ok

01-20-2005, 09:52 PM	#147
j.rhy@n Guest Posts: n/a	Just updated my scores.. 3DMark01 26287 Points 3DMark03 13857 Points 3DMark05 6599 Points ________________________ My Personnel Web Site Profile

01-21-2005, 05:34 PM	#149
11Bravo Guest Posts: n/a	This is the best I can do with an out dates vid card (4 pixel pipes). P4 2.4 Aopen Mb AXS4SPE-UN 533mHz fsb Corsair XMS PC-3200 (2x512) WD 80 Gig S-ATA 7200 rpm FX 5700 Ultra OC'd to 522mHz/1.04gHz 3dmark03 score of 4203 is pretty lame but the best I can do until my 6800GT arrives...lol 3dmark03: http://service.futuremark.com/servle...jectId=3614670