|
|
#1 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2012
Reputation: 17
Posts: 131
|
Question about Minecraft
So the question is:
Were the worlds before (alpha till beta 1.7) better than those of the full version? Post your opinions here. (Also looking for a seed that creates a world more old(alpha till beta 1.7)) |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2011
Reputation: 1596
Posts: 2,816
|
This may be a question better asked on the official minecraft forums. But I never noticed a difference either way (it's all buggy). Although the new build height limit increase was a welcome change to the worlds
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2008
Reputation: 4209
Posts: 5,325
|
What do you mean? Were the worlds themselves better looking/more fun to explore you mean?
I didn't play the game in alpha, but I did in beta. The worlds are much better now than then. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Reputation: 812
Posts: 516
|
I love all the new biomes!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2010
Reputation: 693
Posts: 2,045
|
World gen for Minecraft is total ♥♥♥♥, it was a lot better in early Alpha
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Reputation: 3681
Posts: 1,487
|
Quote:
There were a few neat bugs that were cool in the early version of minecraft, like you could make parts of trees burn forever if you knew how, so my friends and I would commonly have large burning pyres atop our monuments. But those days are over, wood is now properly consumed. But as for land generation, I think the latest iterations are the best. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2010
Reputation: 693
Posts: 2,045
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NszGu...5&feature=plcp
Proper beaches, beautiful mountains (especially the one X got in his world), oceans that don't go forever, endless caves with mushrooms and flowers, and snow worlds. Last edited by FriedGerry: 03-09-2012 at 03:46 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2008
Reputation: 4209
Posts: 5,325
|
I can agree that endless oceans are annoying, and the lack of mushroom caves is somewhat lame.
I've never really found flowers in caves, however. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2009
Reputation: 1631
Posts: 271
|
Currently its way too flat for my liking and the biomes don't integrate very well with eachother
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2004
Reputation: 1288
Posts: 6,143
|
There *are* beaches, kinda..
http://i.imgur.com/r7CFF.jpg You just have to be lucky enough to find them.. What I don't like about the new biome generation is this: http://i.imgur.com/opy9L.jpg Desert, Jungle, and Tundra biome.. looks very unrealistic. I do however like this: http://i.imgur.com/hxyXy.jpg Old generator didn't have this. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Reputation: 384
Posts: 1,537
|
Quote:
The older land generation didn't have nearly the same features. Caves were cramped and short, there weren't biomes or different trees, or different types of water, no snow in certain areas; it was either no snow world or ALL snow world, mountains and hills did not look natural or breathtaking; they were often impossible to believe formations with floating blocks sporadically around, clay was the single rarest resource for some reason, etc. TL;DR - The current land generation in Minecraft is vastly superior to the alpha and beta versions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Reputation: 804
Posts: 2,162
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2004
Reputation: 1288
Posts: 6,143
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4CzUxCHIT6E
The thread: http://www.minecraftforum.net/topic/...e-64-released/ An update for 1.2 should be out within a few days. Last edited by Shadoww0lf: 03-09-2012 at 07:07 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2010
Reputation: 693
Posts: 2,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2012
Reputation: 17
Posts: 131
|
Quote:
+rep Last edited by Felhantin: 03-11-2012 at 06:44 AM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|