|
|
#1 |
![]() Banned
Join Date: Nov 2012
Reputation: 57
Posts: 198
|
What if the degreaser had no weapon switch speed?
But instead, replacing it, would be +25 Damage and the afterburn damage would be -40. It would also have a shorter flamer area.
Would people still use it? (Except the trolls) |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2012
Reputation: 0
Posts: 37
|
No. The point of having a faster weapon switch speed is to pull off axtinguisher crits easily.
If that went away, almost no one would use it. Last edited by Space walker: 12-11-2012 at 07:50 PM. Reason: Stoopid spelling |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2012
Reputation: 52
Posts: 424
|
+25% damage? Hell yes I would! Gas Jockey speed with brutal W+M1 power.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
![]() Banned
Join Date: Nov 2012
Reputation: 57
Posts: 198
|
Quote:
Anyways, then what if the axtinguisher became like the sun on a stick, but pyro version? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2009
Reputation: 175
Posts: 1,388
|
Nah. Flamethrower range is already short enough, any shorter and you may as well be hitting them with melee. Also, afterburn is a great harassment tool and is really not worth giving up for more burst damage. The Degreaser is for combo kills with secondaries and melees and I feel that's the role it needs to stay in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2011
Reputation: 1118
Posts: 4,642
|
Ironically, it'd have more synergy with the Gas Jockey set than the current version
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2011
Reputation: 331
Posts: 863
|
I think that if it didn't have any weapon switch speed, even more people would use it...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2011
Reputation: 1092
Posts: 4,950
|
The Degreaser Level 5 Flamethrower Deals 800 DPS Afterburn heals 75 DPS 25% shorter flame range Most logical weapon 2012. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2012
Reputation: 52
Posts: 424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() Join Date: Aug 2011
Reputation: 564
Posts: 3,919
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|